It really is a matter of "perspective".Quote from Martinghoul:
Guess so... If, to you, being short puts and being long the underlying looks and feels like the same risk, pls accept my sincere congratulations. Such intestinal fortitude as you possess is something I can only dream of, which is why I am NEVER short gamma.
It really doesn't. Sharpe ratio is notoriously useless for any option strategy.Quote from MAESTRO:
It all boils down to the Sharpe ratio of your option strategy.
Quote from heech:
It really doesn't. Sharpe ratio is notoriously useless for any option strategy.
Investing in most financial instruments is (for the sake of argument) a 50/50 thing. You buy GOOG today; 50% chance it'll be up tomorrow, 50% it'll be down tomorrow. It's a coin-flip. If someone comes to me claiming that they've flipped 10 heads in a row with a fair coin (and/or have a high Sharpe ratio), I'm impressed, and I will invest in their coin flipping skill.
Options are completely different. The probability of gain/loss for any option position is determined strictly by the manager, by selecting the strikes they're dealing with. A manager might have flipped 50 heads in a row... but if they're using a coin that's biased to turn up 99% heads, then I'm not at all impressed. That's precisely what MANY option strategies are: flipping a biased coin. You simply can't determine skill by looking at their returns alone.
Well, actually, if a manager came to me and told me they achieved a high Sharpe over time with ATM straddles using strikes half a standard deviation away from the underlying... I personally would invest in them.Quote from atticus:
Short index straddles have a historically-high Sharpe ratio. Does that mean we should all sell atm straddles on the S&P?
I have no idea what you mean by this. Any option "construct", regardless of the trigger, has a probability distribution of the manager's selection. You simply can not look at historical returns without understanding the probability distribution the manager has targeted.Quote from MAESTRO:
I am not talking about a discretionary strategy. What I meant is a predetermined static option construct that gets triggered by some indicator such as Kurtosis or a similar market trigger.
Quote from MAESTRO:
I am not talking about a discretionary strategy. What I meant is a predetermined static option construct that gets triggered by some indicator such as Kurtosis or a similar market trigger.
Quote from heech:
I have no idea what you mean by this. Any option "construct", regardless of the trigger, has a probability distribution of the manager's selection. You simply can not look at historical returns without understanding the probability distribution the manager has targeted.