Why isn't everybody selling options?

Quote from increasenow:
ya'll need to be thinking more of selling/writing naked options...that is where the HUGE cash is
I think we all need to be thinking more of how to prevent you from talking more nonsense, senor... :)
 
Quote from Martinghoul:

Guess so... If, to you, being short puts and being long the underlying looks and feels like the same risk, pls accept my sincere congratulations. Such intestinal fortitude as you possess is something I can only dream of, which is why I am NEVER short gamma.
It really is a matter of "perspective".

If you, in the context of your portfolio, value your option positions by looking at the notional value of the underlying shares (and manage risk/leverage accordingly)... then intestinal fortitude becomes a little easier to build. I think in that sense, it would be like "being long the underlying".

If you value your positions by looking at premium alone... you're never going to be -200% by being long underlying, that's for sure.
 
Quote from MAESTRO:

It all boils down to the Sharpe ratio of your option strategy.

Short index straddles have a historically-high Sharpe ratio. Does that mean we should all sell atm straddles on the S&P?
 
Quote from MAESTRO:

It all boils down to the Sharpe ratio of your option strategy.
It really doesn't. Sharpe ratio is notoriously useless for any option strategy.

Investing in most financial instruments is (for the sake of argument) a 50/50 thing. You buy GOOG today; 50% chance it'll be up tomorrow, 50% it'll be down tomorrow. It's a coin-flip. If someone comes to me claiming that they've flipped 10 heads in a row with a fair coin (and/or have a high Sharpe ratio), I'm impressed, and I will invest in their coin flipping skill.

Options are completely different. The probability of gain/loss for any option position is determined strictly by the manager, by selecting the strikes they're dealing with. A manager might have flipped 50 heads in a row... but if they're using a coin that's biased to turn up 99% heads, then I'm not at all impressed. That's precisely what MANY option strategies are: flipping a biased coin. You simply can't determine skill by looking at their returns alone.
 
Quote from heech:

It really doesn't. Sharpe ratio is notoriously useless for any option strategy.

Investing in most financial instruments is (for the sake of argument) a 50/50 thing. You buy GOOG today; 50% chance it'll be up tomorrow, 50% it'll be down tomorrow. It's a coin-flip. If someone comes to me claiming that they've flipped 10 heads in a row with a fair coin (and/or have a high Sharpe ratio), I'm impressed, and I will invest in their coin flipping skill.

Options are completely different. The probability of gain/loss for any option position is determined strictly by the manager, by selecting the strikes they're dealing with. A manager might have flipped 50 heads in a row... but if they're using a coin that's biased to turn up 99% heads, then I'm not at all impressed. That's precisely what MANY option strategies are: flipping a biased coin. You simply can't determine skill by looking at their returns alone.

I am not talking about a discretionary strategy. What I meant is a predetermined static option construct that gets triggered by some indicator such as Kurtosis or a similar market trigger.
 
Quote from atticus:

Short index straddles have a historically-high Sharpe ratio. Does that mean we should all sell atm straddles on the S&P?
Well, actually, if a manager came to me and told me they achieved a high Sharpe over time with ATM straddles using strikes half a standard deviation away from the underlying... I personally would invest in them.

If a manager came to me and told me they were selling 1 std dev out, I'd tell them they should be profitable at least 68% of their trading months. They better have at least 5 years of track record with fewer than 10 losing months and low DD, so I can see with some confidence that they have skill.

If they're selling strikes 2 std dev out, then they should be profitable 96% out of the year... in 20 years (240 months), they would be expected to have 10 losing months. So, unless they have 20 years of track record with fewer than 5 losing months, I'm not investing.
 
Quote from MAESTRO:

I am not talking about a discretionary strategy. What I meant is a predetermined static option construct that gets triggered by some indicator such as Kurtosis or a similar market trigger.
I have no idea what you mean by this. Any option "construct", regardless of the trigger, has a probability distribution of the manager's selection. You simply can not look at historical returns without understanding the probability distribution the manager has targeted.
 
Quote from MAESTRO:

I am not talking about a discretionary strategy. What I meant is a predetermined static option construct that gets triggered by some indicator such as Kurtosis or a similar market trigger.

Have you looked at the risk-reversal premiums at 15 on VIX? Any strategy using such a trigger is doomed.
 
Back
Top