Why Is The Obvious Not So Obvious?

[J_Smith]

I don't understand why what needs to be said it's not. If you want to help, do, but what's the point of speaking in riddles. There is not a single post with clarity except from those making an attempt at posting the answers. Perhaps the intention is to obfuscate even further, just my perception, take no offense please.

It does not work that way, read the habits pdf.

J_S

 

[i am nobody]

It does not work that way, read the habits pdf.

J_S

Is that a riddle too?
Where is the habits pdf? search function on ET does not give an answer.

 

[J_Smith]

Is that a riddle too?
Where is the habits pdf? search function on ET does not give an answer.

It appears you are posting without reading!

See a few posts back.

J_S

 

[SkyChef]

Is that the answer to my original question about the chart?

J_S

It's the answer to your #4711 post.

For the previous question post #4685, my answer is the lack of display clarity. For why the level was chosen, it's where the control has been lost by the other side.

 

[J_Smith]

If someone said 1950 is now on the cards, what would make someone come to that conclusion?

J_S

 

[SkyChef]

If someone said 1950 is now on the cards, what would make someone come to that conclusion?

J_S

This one is hard. I saw it and have had my line on it. Perhaps watch for those who were left behind before? Give me some time to think about it.

Ed: Was it because 1 side had taken over and subsequent attempt by other side failed?

 

[J_Smith]

JS,
It took me a while today to see it things for myself, so let me rephrase what I have answered before

Wait. Buy when it is still moving up as long as long as your warning level is not breached.

I'm still in discovery mode so there is a lot to rearrange myself.

You will have to be very clear, as I am a bit slow.

So,

This one is hard. I saw it and have had my line on it. Perhaps watch for those who were left behind before? Give me some time to think about it.

Ed: Was it because 1 side had taken over and subsequent attempt by other side failed?

No, it is a very simple method that is applicable to any timeframe, and even though we know the only certain thing is uncertainty, we still need to focus on the most probable outcomes, so if it happens sooner rather than later, we are not surprised and can take the appropriate action.

Risk control at all times is obvious, but to identify low risk entries, you must know one when you see one, which of course is a certain price level.

I take it this makes sense?

J_S

 

[Vindago]

Hi JS, I am intrigued... I think that 1950 is likely as the last pullback on the way down was about there...

Alternatively (but not necessarily so), it is a range matter as 1950 is about 100 higher than 1850, while 2100 is about 100 higher than 2000...

as VWAP is well used...

VO

 

[Onra]

It would be easier to see what you are taking about if you posted a chart.

J_S

Edit:
J_Smith: "No, it is a very simple method that is applicable to any timeframe"
Hmm.. so I'm on the wrong track...

 

[SkyChef]

JS,

Yes, it does. Thanks.

Edit: I got it. That's the price level w/ lowest risk at the corresponding entry. Damn. I'm so thick.