I do have one discrete thought â on a completely different note
Trading is the same as gambling â fuck no it ainât
Trading has more inherent risk and potential to break your ass, than gambling ever thought about havingâ¦
==================================
Place a bet â the most you can lose is what youâve betâ¦. And the games are designed to automatically get you out â no additional effort on the gamblerâs part is required
Place a trade â unless you identify a stop and honor it â there are only two ways to get out of a losing trade â you nut up and exit⦠or you broker liquidates your position, which is usually followed by a margin call demanding more money (been there done that)
And lest we forget â as long as you have the capital (be it margin or actual funds)â adding to a losing trade is always a possibility (the price has gone to far for too long and just has to come back syndrome)
Betting â once the bet is made it is madeâ¦
Granted you may be able to trade on credit, but even that must be approved by the house â so there exist an external protective mechanism â of sorts
None exists for the idiot punching the mouse button
====================================
Betting â the odds are know on all games
Trading â although via back testing some like to think a positive expectancy can be achieved â fact is the mkt is uncertainâ¦.
And although price can only go three ways â there are an infinite number of ways things can come together to make it go one of those three ways
Some use the analogy of card counting as a way to improve the odds⦠same as having a positive expectancy I supposeâ¦. (which I surmise means something to the effect of identify the current trend, waiting for a pull back/ break out, then entering in the direction of the trend
I also surmise this is a mechanism to help these folks cope with uncertaintyâ¦.
I maintain the mkt is uncertain â period (so act like it.. and damn well trade like it - every time you trade)
One other note on positive expectancy⦠say its 95% - that means you are still guaranteed 5 losing trade out of every 100 (shocks to the system notwithstanding)
Suppose those 5 come at the same time â you prepared to handle that much draw down
Suppose you get 10 losers in a row (out of a 200 trade sample size) â now you prepared to handle that much drawdownâ¦
What if you get 190 winning trades in a row â you still on your guard and ready for the 10 losers⦠or have you laxed your use of stops â and will get your ass handed to you once the first of those 10 losers show up
====================================
Betting â rules are already know and well published⦠Plus you have gamming commissions to ensure the rules are followed by both party's
Trading â only rule is â you have the money â you can trade⦠all other rules â the trader must create... and more importantly â the trader must follow
=======================================
I only wish trading was like gamblingâ¦. Be a hell of a lot less for me to concern myself with
It ainâtâ¦
Traders must work their asses off too simply to get their inherent risk to an acceptable / survivable level...
Then of course they must maintain that vigilant till the day they retire
==================================
NY and I had a discussion about gambling and trading being the same a while back⦠unfortunately I relented⦠when in fact I should have pushed back a little â completely my bad
Just a random thought from a dumbass - and not wanting to derail the current topic
RN
Trading is the same as gambling â fuck no it ainât
Trading has more inherent risk and potential to break your ass, than gambling ever thought about havingâ¦
==================================
Place a bet â the most you can lose is what youâve betâ¦. And the games are designed to automatically get you out â no additional effort on the gamblerâs part is required
Place a trade â unless you identify a stop and honor it â there are only two ways to get out of a losing trade â you nut up and exit⦠or you broker liquidates your position, which is usually followed by a margin call demanding more money (been there done that)
And lest we forget â as long as you have the capital (be it margin or actual funds)â adding to a losing trade is always a possibility (the price has gone to far for too long and just has to come back syndrome)
Betting â once the bet is made it is madeâ¦
Granted you may be able to trade on credit, but even that must be approved by the house â so there exist an external protective mechanism â of sorts
None exists for the idiot punching the mouse button
====================================
Betting â the odds are know on all games
Trading â although via back testing some like to think a positive expectancy can be achieved â fact is the mkt is uncertainâ¦.
And although price can only go three ways â there are an infinite number of ways things can come together to make it go one of those three ways
Some use the analogy of card counting as a way to improve the odds⦠same as having a positive expectancy I supposeâ¦. (which I surmise means something to the effect of identify the current trend, waiting for a pull back/ break out, then entering in the direction of the trend
I also surmise this is a mechanism to help these folks cope with uncertaintyâ¦.
I maintain the mkt is uncertain â period (so act like it.. and damn well trade like it - every time you trade)
One other note on positive expectancy⦠say its 95% - that means you are still guaranteed 5 losing trade out of every 100 (shocks to the system notwithstanding)
Suppose those 5 come at the same time â you prepared to handle that much draw down
Suppose you get 10 losers in a row (out of a 200 trade sample size) â now you prepared to handle that much drawdownâ¦
What if you get 190 winning trades in a row â you still on your guard and ready for the 10 losers⦠or have you laxed your use of stops â and will get your ass handed to you once the first of those 10 losers show up
====================================
Betting â rules are already know and well published⦠Plus you have gamming commissions to ensure the rules are followed by both party's
Trading â only rule is â you have the money â you can trade⦠all other rules â the trader must create... and more importantly â the trader must follow
=======================================
I only wish trading was like gamblingâ¦. Be a hell of a lot less for me to concern myself with
It ainâtâ¦
Traders must work their asses off too simply to get their inherent risk to an acceptable / survivable level...
Then of course they must maintain that vigilant till the day they retire
==================================
NY and I had a discussion about gambling and trading being the same a while back⦠unfortunately I relented⦠when in fact I should have pushed back a little â completely my bad
Just a random thought from a dumbass - and not wanting to derail the current topic
RN