Quote from rossky:
I think "be able to" is placed here on purpose. Has it happened to you that you act = do, and do it, and do it, ...and then you find yourself not being able to do it anymore? It happens to me for not so obvious reasons.
Mysteron said that the ultimate obvious is not attainable. He also said that faith without evidence is delusional BS. Mysteron, could you explain, please?
I also think that since I speak about "being able to" here, it probably means that I failed to fully embrace Uncertainty, or it simply wears me down way too often and too fast.
Actually it was TO who said "the ultimate obvious is not attainable". On the one hand the statement seemed to be saying that there is an ultimate secret that will never be revealed. On the other hand I thought the statement was possibly just word play meaning: the ultimate obvious is not in TA but is in being able, i.e. in oneself.
I did previously state: "faith without evidence is delusional BS." Thats a general statement about any form of faith without evidence, such as religious beliefs, astrology, homeopathy, luck etc. When I said it, it was in response to the reference by TO to "a small big secret rare" after I had asked a question about trend lines. The reason I said it was because any mention of secrets that are not going to be shared, explained and for which there is no apparent way to gain an understanding, requires an act of faith to accept they are true.
The Expert, who you may have heard of, used to post on Trade2Win (and ET too). On that site there was a discussion of opening gaps and H-L, C-O ranges. He claimed there was a secret that would not be revealed and that it would 'blow your mind away' when it was seen. When I attempted to discuss this much later on a private site I never got any meaningful response, so over a long period of time I tried to discover the secret by looking at charts similar to one shown, and considered all the possible relationships and correlations of opening gap with H,L,C,O of the previous and current day. Eventually I discovered it, or so I thought and was very pleased with myself. Not long after that I found an error in my program and realised that I had in fact not found any secret at all. After that experience I concluded that The Expert had also, most likely, made a mistake and was wrong. Of course I may be wrong, but without any other evidence I have to rely on my own investigations which failed to find any useful property of gaps.
So now if anyone suggests that there is a secret then I'm only inclined to believe it if there is some means of acquiring evidence too. The concept of chocolate teapot comes to mind!