It's not my intention to criticize people who trade patterns, just to share my experience with you why <b>I</p> personally will not.
This chart sets up as a simple pennant. One guy will look at this chart and say buy a breakout up because the bottom is in and we are going to breakout from a higher low -- that's bullish!
The next guy will say, heck no, the market is weak, it's gonna break support and head lower -- that's bearish.
So there is dilemma one -- which way will it break? The odds are 50/50.
Dilemma two -- the odds of the next tick being higher or lower is also 50/50. If you combine the two probabilities you are looking at a strategy that has a, best case, 25% win rate. .50 x .50 = .25.
The guy who took this short has a nice loss. Had it broken up the same thing could have happened.
If you guys are winning trading patterns, more power to you. I won't touch them with a ten foot pole.
If you are <i>not</i> winning on patterns ask yourself... why would I choose to trade a strategy that has a probability of winning that is approximately 25%?
This chart sets up as a simple pennant. One guy will look at this chart and say buy a breakout up because the bottom is in and we are going to breakout from a higher low -- that's bullish!
The next guy will say, heck no, the market is weak, it's gonna break support and head lower -- that's bearish.
So there is dilemma one -- which way will it break? The odds are 50/50.
Dilemma two -- the odds of the next tick being higher or lower is also 50/50. If you combine the two probabilities you are looking at a strategy that has a, best case, 25% win rate. .50 x .50 = .25.
The guy who took this short has a nice loss. Had it broken up the same thing could have happened.
If you guys are winning trading patterns, more power to you. I won't touch them with a ten foot pole.
If you are <i>not</i> winning on patterns ask yourself... why would I choose to trade a strategy that has a probability of winning that is approximately 25%?