I don't know anything about ES, but if the 25 EMA doesn't provide strong S/R intraday, find out which one does.
Quote from ProfitTakgFool:
No doubt the losses are limited, at least hopefully they are.
If you are winning trading this method then it speaks very highly of your trading skill because from a mathematical standpoint, it's a losing strategy. It does not surprise me that some people can make money trading patterns but I don't see how it's possible. I guess I've been poisoned by all thos statistics classes I took![]()
![]()
Quote from optioncoach:
Well I dont buy your statistical analysis on it too much since your approach was biased going into it. Also, as you know from trading, %prob of success is meaningless depending on risk/reward and trademanagement.
If you have 20% rate of success but make 50 points on wins and lose 10 on losses you still are making money even though I dont like that rate of success. if you are simply 50-50 but have good stop losses and let the winners go to logical target then you still are well ahead. It all comes down to risk management more than anything.
Quote from hypostomus:
I don't know anything about ES, but if the 25 EMA doesn't provide strong S/R intraday, find out which one does.
Quote from ProfitTakgFool:
If you are <i>not</i> winning on patterns ask yourself... why would I choose to trade a strategy that has a probability of winning that is approximately 25%?
Quote from hypostomus:
Just asking. Then why trade when volume is so low, confirming that price is random or chaotic rather than trending?