Why don't more women trade?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally posted by Toni
Actually, I read the entire thread... There were good posts. Unfortunately, they were hard to find and quickly bashed.

"hey, doesn't pay to have your nose stuck up in the air like that..." - limitdown

Thank you, glad that my commentary was taken equally seriously.

"Another question is why didn't all the women you speak of come in and have fun with us? " - Don Bright666

Limitdown's comment is an excellent example of why. Why come in and try to give our side? What's the point? Do all of you guy's feel this way?

Speaking only for myself, I can say that I am often very sensitive to women's needs, especially when I want to get laid.

777
 
Originally posted by Toni
Actually, I read the entire thread... There were good posts. Unfortunately, they were hard to find and quickly bashed.

"hey, doesn't pay to have your nose stuck up in the air like that..." - limitdown

Thank you, glad that my commentary was taken equally seriously.

"Another question is why didn't all the women you speak of come in and have fun with us? " - Don Bright666

Limitdown's comment is an excellent example of why. Why come in and try to give our side? What's the point? Do all of you guys feel this way?

hey, just jump in....

I really don't think that the trading process or the mental and emotional disposition of a trader, as far as the discussions of the topics and the causal events effecting the marketplace care whether the person clicking the mouse to buy|sell is either Male of Female.

Hence, behind the moniker of the handle (i.e. our stage names) and behind the electronic faces of these computer screens, no matter where our trading desks are, we're all equal.

Remember, smiling faces, smiling faces sometimes tell truths....
 
Originally posted by limitdown


wow, I see what you mean, however, you missed some pretty good comments, somewheres just after the start of this thread.

hey, doesn't pay to have your nose stuck up in the air like that...

OK, limitdown. I took your reprimand seriously and just read through all the posts. Boy, do I wish I hadn't wasted my time. My original opinion about the overall quality of commentary here remains unchanged. Aside from vladiator's inclusion of an academic paper abstract, I saw next to nothing that challenged my initial appraisal of this thread. If anything, I was even further struck by how utterly moronic and sophomoric most of it was.

I'm sorry if you find my response to be arrogant, but I guess when the level of commentary is this low, any reaction against it will almost unavoidably appear condescending.
 
Originally posted by Norske Trader


OK, limitdown. I took your reprimand seriously and just read through all the posts. Boy, do I wish I hadn't wasted my time. My original opinion about the overall quality of commentary here remains unchanged. Aside from vladiator's inclusion of an academic paper abstract, I saw next to nothing that challenged my initial appraisal of this thread. If anything, I was even further struck by how utterly moronic and sophomoric most of it was.

I'm sorry if you find my response to be arrogant, but I guess when the level of commentary is this low, any reaction against it will almost unavoidably appear condescending.

I guess what you said is true! We're all just having fun. These markets have cooked, burned, fried, baked, skinned and poink'ed all of us, and the steam that's rising is the frustration.

Who ever started this thread was evidently reaching out to tap into common questions (evidenced by those who replied, stupid, moronic or otherwise).

There's other threads not worth reading:
.. something about how we chose our handles / names
.. something about CNNFN/CNBC commercials
.. something about bashing the Bright Brothers
.. something about trading journals that go on adnauseum
.. something about how one trader "feels" over another

Hey, when it boils down to that kind of slash and burn subjective analysis that you mentioned, then most of these threads aren't worth reading, however, what's worth reading are the content and intent, well meaning or otherwise.

What you're also seeing is iron sharpening iron, in the exchange of ideas, thoughts and otherwise. After all, if we didn't engage each other, we'd only have ourselves to keep ourselves company, and how mentally stimulating is that? Perhaps in some cases, quite!

Cheers, and remember,

have fun!
 
There's other threads not worth reading:

.. something about how we chose our handles / names
.. something about CNNFN/CNBC commercials
.. something about bashing the Bright Brothers
.. something about trading journals that go on adnauseum
.. something about how one trader "feels" over another

Thank you. Saved me a lot of time. :D
 
Norske Trader and Toni


Thanks for ruining perfectly fine moronic male thread. :)

I was rather enlightened by the comments that women can’t trade due to absence of balls.

What makes me worried though is the fact that sometimes I don’t have the balls to enter a perfectly good trade. What dos that make me – a trading eunuch? :(
 
Because they have never discovered this helpful and rightly named product.:cool:

It's rightly named ''Beano'' ,buy it at better drugstores.

Like the ad slogan ''Don't sit there and fume!'' Funny but true.:)

Probably even more helpful if you have as many traders as Bright or Lynx Capital.

_________________

''Sure helped our marriage''Linda Cherry,wife of DR. Reginald Cherry MD quote {''beano'',food enzyme dietary supplimant}
 
Originally posted by OPTIONAL777


Speaking only for myself, I can say that I am often very sensitive to women's needs, especially when I want to get laid.

777

You can always count on 777 for a good laugh.
Why is this thread going so long anyway?:cool:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top