Quote from logic_man:
Can someone please explain, for the love of clucking Christ, what there is that isn't "in the past" the instant an instant passes? Throwing the phrase "in the past" around like it is some kind of relevant critique in and of itself is nonsense. It's a given.
Some people know how to use the past better than others. Why humans would be differentiated on every skill except for that one would be interesting to hear about. One guy can use the past to make some sense of the future and another guy can't or can't as well or as consistently. Just like every other skill. The way in which each person is constrained by having to exist partially in the past and partially in the present differs from person to person.
Even in your example of GSAM dumping 10,000 lots, why would they be doing that? Obviously because of something they've just seen, i.e. something "in the past". Or are you saying that not only do they have a "crystal ball", that "crystal ball" uses information from the future to point GSAM in the right direction? That's one hell of a crystal ball. Think about what you are implying with your example, not just what you are saying.