The jihadi suicide bombers welcome death.
Personally I think they lack the courage to live. The fact that they kill others too is imho despicable. Isil are getting their rewards in lead not gold - in the form of bullets.
Serves them right, they get no sympathy from me.
They don't kill each other by themselves for welcoming death!
Could it be possible that there still an element of revenge/hate in the suicide acts, in order to deliver/represent an important message from them?
Did they carry out the same acts to hurt/kill others so "frequently" all the time in the past hundred/thousand years? If not, why did they just start the series of acts at the beginning?
When some suicide groups like the old IRA, the old Palestine bombers, etc. have stopped for some time their suicide acts, does that indicate that they had attained what they want after delivering their suicide message which was heard and remedied by their target authorities/governments?
Without adequate reflections and analyses, any single-sided/minded response against suicide bombers could be just short-term thinking, without solving the root-cause problems, perhaps.
My suggestion is the authority/government should respond also to any suicide bombing acts by openly announcing, other than their suicide acts are wrong and unacceptable, that the supporters of bombers should voice their message using whatever peaceful/non-violent channels they possibly could, such as X, Y, Z. Rather than suicide bombing.
How often we hear something like that after encountering any suicide bombing acts in the past? Therefore, the next potential bombers would consider their alternatives after receiving bombing assignments/instructions!
The alternatives X, Y, Z etc., that must be safe/secure/reliable/confidential channels similar to some existing anti-corruption channels, should be advertised publicly frequently, in order to provide effective/proper channels/alternatives for any potential bombers a place of second thought - simply human nature!
The authorities/governments should find an effective way so that they can hear/capture the potential bombers voices in advance, with a pro-active approach. Even the same planned terror acts would still happen in their originally planned way.
The point is say when a suicide bomber suddenly changes her/his mind during the process, is there any safe/secure way to protect her/him in order for her/him to give up the terror act from that moment? Surely there were some previous changing-mind cases before.
Just 10 cents! LOL