Why Do Most Retail Traders Favour Technical Analysis ?

Markets only trend. They do not range.

False, in fact Step 1 should be determining if your instrument of choice is trending or ranging before you begin to risk money. Step 2 asking the very same question in various timeframes or chart types of choice working your way down from up.
 
Markets only trend. They do not range.

Definitely false. In fact if something is priced fairly and a market is operating efficiently it should be expected to range until external factors either change things, buyers or sellers significantly alter their expectations, or something else happens. It's just that the latter 3 happen quite often, but it doesn't mean that they always have to happen.
 
A range is a series of alternating trends when you drill down to a smaller bar interval. On a smaller bar interval chart, when price visit s a previous swing high or low and turns back the direction of the opposite swing high/low a superb "scalping" opportunity presents itself. An adept scalper can sometimes extract more profit from the range by trading it both ways than from a leg of a trend. The risk:reward is excellent as well because the acceptable loss when trading a range is very small (mine is the equivalent of $35/futures contract). On a smaller bar interval chart, you can also see when the market "tips its hand" for the break out of the range and get positioned for the strong trending move that usually follows.

It takes hundreds of hours of careful study to come to understand how to trade this way. Bob Volman's book Forex Price Action Scalping lays down the foundation needed to move into the more advanced tactics of trading ranges that occur in a bar interval smaller than your main trading bar interval.

A trader who uses a 5-min chart for setups/environment would use a 1-min chart for scalping opportunities, for example.
 
1) Let's look into intraday trend formed by a report. Let's assume on Wed, a report came out that oil supplies increased. As anyone who took a basic Economic course in college knows that when supply increases price decreases. So price now trends down. That is how a trend forms and will either continue until another report comes out or a certain price level is reached. This is why random walk theory and price drivers are bullshit. We have cause and effect that can be quantified.

2) Now while markets are in fact always trending (caused by a previous report), trend can take a break and form a range. If the range is wide enough it can in fact be traded intraday. For a longer term trend trader, you would not see this range and think that there is no such thing as range trading since your stops and targets lie outside of the range. For example, if you are short, you would just be sitting on your position till the market breaks out of the range and either continues to go down or goes back up and hits your stop. Either way, you don't see the range since you are already in a trade.

3) This is not to say that sometimes the market is during the day either moving randomly or in a barb wire sideways formation. In both cases, you should not be initiating a trade or if in a trade, you should get out of it. Again this does not apply to a longer term trader that is holding over multiple days.

WARNING

Nothing but inactionable platitudes and feel good nonsense like "markets always trending".

Don't let this guy's mod status fool anyone into thinking he knows anything beyond posting.
 
WARNING

surf-warning-if-in-doubt-dont-go-out.jpg
 
...Everyone has been coming up with fundamental analysis theories about greece which had me thinking can you really gain an edge by reading a few articles from Bloomberg, Reuters, WSJ, maybe watch a few economic reports and connect the dots before others ?

I remember reading somewhere that if you spend 10 minutes reading a financial times you have wasted 7 minutes.

Im talking about global macro products like index futures, FX, bonds, commodities not individual equities.

You don't need to try to get an edge from fundamental analysis, global new events, economic reports or whatever...you just need to understand that sometimes the information can be useful or helpful to your investments or trading.

Me personally, I need to know what's going on in the world via the above info. It helps me to not trade with tunnel vision and helps me with my overall market context for the day. I just don't believe in trading via technical analysis alone as if nothing else matters. Simply, I choose both (FA and TA) instead of one over the other.
 
Ive made TA work for me but it's far from the conventional way. Hence, my name.

Never read a book on how I approach charts and read the market, not even remotely close.

What I can say, is that every book or article I've read on TA sucks.

Typically what indicator writers, mentors and snake oil salesmen do is cherry pick an example and describe how their "method" or "indicator" works on that sample, and then try to make you believe how easy it can be; that is assuming the level of subjectity does not go through the roof, which is yet, another form of scam.

However, if you do your homework, and you do forward testing you can prove to yourself how full of shit they can me, all tricks that lead into lies and deceit, far from their claims, in fact, when you factor in commission, mistakes and slippage it all leads to negative expectancy.

That almost includes almost every journal idiot, or technique publicly discussed in ET as well.

....but people are gullible, so there's a market out there.

I don't believe this is why retail traders favor technical analysis if that's what you're implying. In contrast, as stated earlier in this thread...it starts with the marketing/advertising by the data / charts / software / brokers / forum vendors.

Simply, TA is a great way to attract new clients. Then after the clients gain access to TA...they then begin looking around to learn how to use it because the resources they first heard about TA do not teach it.

I remember seeing my first advertisements about charts and indicators by Omega Research (now called TradeStation) back in the late 1980s. Then in the late 90s and early 2000 those day trading commercials hit heavy with all kinds of slogans with charts with indicators.

Nothing really has changed today. For example, go to eSignal website and you'll see statements like "Learn the Secrets of Successful Trading"...continuing into statements like "Make A fortune in ANY market...its easy, fast and rewarding...then click on the eSignal chart link or Advanced GET chart link next and you see charts...Ellitot Wave, False Bar Stochastics and many other goodies. Go to TradeStation into their education section...in the first 4 lessons...you're hit heavy with chart analysis while nothing about discipline, risk management, proper capitalization and so on.

This is what newbies see...charts and data as a way to financial freedom.

Now go to the big boys like Bloomberg, CQG, Realtick and so on...they don't hit you with all the fancy charts and indicators mainly because they're not trying to attract newbie retail traders. In contrast, they're hitting hard with ads about data integrity, cost analysis tools, order routing intelligence and so on. These are trading tools not attractive to newbie retail traders but because they're trying to attract firms and professional traders.

Yeah, they do some chart advertisements but its not their primary tool to attract their clients.

Heck, if a retail trader is new to trading (called newbie trader) and goes to bloomberg website...they'll quickly assumed its a news only site and wouldn't even consider them as their charting/data vendor.

Simply, retail traders are attracted to technical analysis because its marketed (heavily) to them specifically by those I mentioned above because its easily affordable as a start up cost of trading in comparison to other more professional tools.
 
I don't believe this is why retail traders favor technical analysis if that's what you're implying. In contrast, as stated earlier in this thread...it starts with the marketing/advertising by the data / charts / software / brokers / forum vendors.

Simply, TA is a great way to attract new clients. Then after the clients gain access to TA...they then begin looking around to learn how to use it because the resources they first heard about TA do not teach it.

I remember seeing my first advertisements about charts and indicators by Omega Research (now called TradeStation) back in the late 1980s. Then in the late 90s and early 2000 those day trading commercials hit heavy with all kinds of slogans with charts with indicators.

Nothing really has changed today. For example, go to eSignal website and you'll see statements like "Learn the Secrets of Successful Trading"...continuing into statements like "Make A fortune in ANY market...its easy, fast and rewarding...then click on the eSignal chart link or Advanced GET chart link next and you see charts...Ellitot Wave, False Bar Stochastics and many other goodies. Go to TradeStation into their education section...in the first 4 lessons...you're hit heavy with chart analysis while nothing about discipline, risk management, proper capitalization and so on.

This is what newbies see...charts and data as a way to financial freedom.

Now go to the big boys like Bloomberg, CQG, Realtick and so on...they don't hit you with all the fancy charts and indicators mainly because they're not trying to attract newbie retail traders. In contrast, they're hitting hard with ads about data integrity, cost analysis tools, order routing intelligence and so on. These are trading tools not attractive to newbie retail traders but because they're trying to attract firms and professional traders.

Yeah, they do some chart advertisements but its not their primary tool to attract their clients.

Heck, if a retail trader is new to trading (called newbie trader) and goes to bloomberg website...they'll quickly assumed its a news only site and wouldn't even consider them as their charting/data vendor.

Simply, retail traders are attracted to technical analysis because its marketed (heavily) to them specifically by those I mentioned above because its easily affordable as a start up cost of trading in comparison to other more professional tools.

Blue Line Jumps 11 Per Cent
 
the assumption the poster makes is that because retail traders favour technical analyses, that makes it garbage because most retail traders are losers. Tip - there are very big traders who use technical analyses, spreading techniques, systems trading, pure orderflow reading. There are also losing traders who lose all of the above. Point - methodology isnt that important. What is important is fit, practicing and acquiring skill, and mastering your psychology.
 
Back
Top