Quote from trader198:
the fact is for a 10k account, there is no room to play statistical game to trade crude. several rounds loss, you are out.
statistical game is based on "you can play as much as you can or you can play infinitely", the reality is you have limited resources and limited mindset.
That's ridiculous. If you trade with a maximum stop loss of $200 in crude, it would require more than 30 losses in a row to knock a $10K account below intraday margin requirements. The only way that will happen is if you a) don't know how to trade, or b) have serious psychological problems.
Since nobody has the ability to play infinitely when trading (everyone's account size is finite, even LTCM and MF Global), developing a plan based on probability in your favor and mastering the ability to trade that plan is crucial. It doesn't matter if your average risk is far greater than your average reward, doesn't matter if your win percentage is 90% or 10%; all that matters is that the trading plan produces profit consistently in the time frame you're trading.
For example, if you have a 10% win rate, but your average winning trade is fifteen times greater than your average losing trade, that's a tremendous edge. If your risk:reward ratio is 5:1, but you have a 90% win rate, that's also a tremendous edge. If your win rate is 50%, you can do very well with a 1:2 R:R.
Here's a scenario: Trader A with a $50K trading account has a trading plan that produces consistent profitability trading a single futures contract, enough profit to make a living. This trader teaches Trader B how to trade this way. Trader B practices in a demo account and generates excellent daily profits trading a single contract. Trader B then begins trading live with the minimum account needed to trade this futures contract ($5000) and loses money.
What happened? Trader B strayed from proper trade management in order to avoid the possibility of losses (moving stops to break even way too quickly, and never exiting losers way too quickly). Trader B has psychological problems related to money and loss.
Another scenario: Trader A with a $500,000 trading account trades a single contract of CL and generates an average profit of $400 a day over a period of time through varying market conditions, producing an annual "salary" of $90,000 without ever averaging down, trading without a stop loss, or increasing size. People think, "Yes, that's a very nice 18% return, well done! It demonstrates that a well-capitalized trader can actually make a living at this."
Trader B with a $10,000 trading account trades a single contract of CL and generates an average profit of $400 a day over a period of time through varying market conditions, producing an annual "salary" of $90,000 without ever averaging down, trading without a stop loss, or increasing size. People think, "A 900% return??? That's a bunch of bullshit! Anyone claiming that is a liar or a snake oil salesman or both!"
Now the reality is that the intraday margin requirement to trade a single contract of CL is less than $5000. Well-capitalized Trader A doesn't need a $500K account to make $90,000 a year. If you dig deeply into why many traders (or wannabe traders) believe that being extremely well-capitalized is an absolute requirement for profitability, you'll often find that such traders believe the only way to trade profitably is to be able to handle deep drawdowns, mainly as a result of trading without protective stops and/or averaging down.
In fact, this is not a requirement for profitability.
I'll continue with a graphic demonstration of the thought processes of the average 95% who lose, as compared to the 5% who win.