Why Can't I Trade with the Trend

Quote from ProfLogic:

Hummm, I was under the impression that all retired congressmen & senators drew from the Social Security fund, even though they don't pay a penny into it. At least that is what the GAO states.
I thought I read their main coverage is through private plans???
 
Quote from nononsense:

I thought I read their main coverage is through private plans???

I would be interested if someone knows for sure to post it. I would ask my daughter, she would know for sure, but she's on vacation.
 
Hank,
Just checking once again...where's the website with your real-time track record? Thanks.



Quote from jsp326:

Can you provide the URL with your track record?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from hank rollins:

my publically posted record, since 2000, speaks for itself.


your one day challenge means nothing in realworld trading.
 
Quote from jsp326:

Hank,
Are you going to give the website or other source of your real-time track record? Just checking once again...
jsp,

Your question is certainly not unreasonable but goes squarely against the etiquette and traditions of our cherished ET.

Be good,
nononsense
:D
 
Quote from nononsense:

jsp,

Your question is certainly not unreasonable but goes squarely against the etiquette and traditions of our cherished ET.

Be good,
nononsense
:D

I see.. I guess it could be considered free advertising?

Maybe he'll PM me with the info. I'm not interested in being a subscriber/customer of his, I was just curious.

But when you turn down a challenge and say your track record speaks for itself...knowing you can't provide your track record b/c of the board's etiquette...hmmm, I guess it just doesn't impress me. But maybe he's some famous trader/money manager (hiding under the alias of a singer??) and I'm the only one here who doesn't know his real identity...

I'd still like to see him take on ProfLogic's challenge, though.
 
With-the-trend techniques are by far more difficult psychologically to follow compare to counter trend ones. The simple reason is: you have to be enormously discipline to take, let's say, 15 small loses on a row to capture one good trade that would pay for all of your efforts. It is very easy to nibble 1 - 2 ticks trading counter trend following any kind of oscillator rather then keep on taking it in the chin. Although with-the-trend trading is by far more difficult it is, also, by far more rewarding due to the "fat tails" that seem to pop up everywhere these days.
 
a member points to the fat tails that crop up all over these days. "'ER ,-------- Have you tested that ". There has not been a decline or rise of more than 2% in the s and p in last 2 years. The implied volatility stands steady as a stone wall at 11% . And the main exponent and player of fat tails has taken a " sabbatical from trading " amid presumably drastic losses since he stopped reporting results after a swoonful period at the very market bottom. Are you sure that the evidence, both practical and empirical of the past 2 years is not consistent with narrow tails? Recall that a normal distribution with a mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1%, ( about the empirical stand dev of most markets including equity futures, ), 5% of the observations will exceed + or - 2% and and 1 % of the observations, or 5 every two years will exceed 2.5 %. Perhaps this is the calm before the storm. ? profturf
 
Quote from MAESTRO:

With-the-trend techniques are by far more difficult psychologically to follow compare to counter trend ones. The simple reason is: you have to be enormously discipline to take, let's say, 15 small loses on a row to capture one good trade that would pay for all of your efforts. It is very easy to nibble 1 - 2 ticks trading counter trend following any kind of oscillator rather then keep on taking it in the chin. Although with-the-trend trading is by far more difficult it is, also, by far more rewarding due to the "fat tails" that seem to pop up everywhere these days.

With-the-trend techniques are by far more difficult because you need to have a system. Nibble 1-2 ticks has more to do with gambling, it has nothing at all to do with trading.
Trendfollowers need a vision.
The difficulty grows exponentially with the lenght of time that your in a trade. If you stay in for 1 hour you need to know what the direction is. I have daytrades that last sometimes 3-4 hours or even longer before i get out. I wonder what a scalper would do if he had to stay in 3-4 hours. His account would probably be wiped out in a few days.
I think one becomes a scalper because he's not able to make big rides on the trend.
A trendfollower doesn't have to take 15 small loses for every good trade.
 
Back
Top