Broken people save broken people they say so I guess people like Wallet are helping break people.
Why are there few or (zero?) stories about WHY the non-vaxed are refusing the jab?
- Thread starter Scataphagos
- Start date
Broken people save broken people they say so I guess people like Wallet are helping break people.
Speaking of “Horse paste”, what are the odds the new drug by Merck to treat Covid infections is merely a changed molecule of Ivermectin, a lower margin product? If so, the irony.
As it is, most pharmaceuticals were originally based on natural herbs, but these herbs are not patentable, thus do not have the profit potential that patented products have. A pharmaceutical company can gain a patent by simply by changing a molecule of the herb. It is not unusual for this new compound to be less effective, yet have more side effects than the original herb.
US pharmaceutical company care more about their bottom line than the health of their customers. After all, healthy customers are less profitable to the healthcare industry than healthy ones, right?
Shilling for pharmaceutical companies is on the same level as shilling for tobacco companies, especially when it comes to vaccinating children against a virus of low risk to them.
The only irony is that trucker hats are the largest baseball style hat.
So I can't find a molecule for the new Merck drug but I would bet money it has a much smaller molecular weight than sheep wormer below, is a simpler molecule by far to get where it needs to get.
You are pushing debunked nonsense again. This anti-vaxxer talking point that the new new Merck drug is just an alteration of Ivermectin is laughable and already been completely proven false. You really should stop pushing nonsense you find in blogs and social media.
Protease inhibitors, Pfizermectin, Mermectin If it works and saves lives, give them their patients and bloated prices. Everyone benefits in the long run.
If there’s an actual FDA approved therapeutic are the EUA’s still valid for Moderna and J&J?
Ah I found it. Let's play the game of post two drug molecules. One, big lanky one, is filtered by the lungs so can't reach a clinically significant level there. The other is smaller (but a larger picture here) and uses different pathways.
Last edited:
I’m all for it, which ever one works best. It’s my understanding they all are protease inhibitors, so albeit chemically altered they’re working towards the same endpoint.
Read early on, there were similarities between HIV1 and SARS-CoV-2, and they found some therapeutic success with HIV drugs. Looks like they are pinning it down.
Question, there’s several different therapeutics being developed, 6 months from now if they’re showing success, cases down, deaths down, everyone back to normal. Can we stop the political witch-hunting?
No, because your idiot big mouth will be spreading creamy worm free horseshit causing unnecessary death till past then. Manslaughter really.
I guess you are in one of those 'saved' churches where you have a no-hell promise deal. Well let's hope that works out for you. It won't but thoughts and prayers.
Speaking of hell, I tracked down that John's relative who is an on-the-run pedophile priest (defrocked) today.