While on this same subject, Peil, don't you find it rather fascinating that Jesus, assuming there was a Jesus, must have almost certainly been gay. In his day, folks married quite young because they did not live long, except for Moses of course. Jesus was unmarried, unless we are to believe a popular movie where he was married to Mary Magdalene. Well I guess you could say that the movie is at least as believable as the bible, as both Jesus and Mary Magdalene are probably fictional so far as any historians can tell, other than Christian historians naturally. In any case, it's an interesting observation that the birth of Jesus is the last virgin birth that we modern westerners are aware of. Anyone that gets pregnant without being impregnated, according to modern thinking, is likely to give birth to a fictional baby. Does that make sense? Just trying to figure this out.Quote from peilthetraveler:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/30/russia-anti-gay-olympic-games-sochi_n_3676311.html
Russia is known to be a nation with a majority of Atheists. You would think that a nation of atheists would be all for gays. You would also think that coming out with anti-gay legislation they would cave under pressure from the international community and threats of losing hosting the Olympics, but no..they dont give into the pansy ass leftists.
Way to show some balls, Russia. Keep it up, and you may see a large influx of Christians heading your way.
In the Jesus stories of the Bible, none of the disciples married either, so far as I know. ( I ask you to confirm this, because I am really not up on the bible as I should be.) Consequently, doesn't it seem rather odd to you that a bunch of horny, unmarried, young men were all hanging out together with no girl friends so far as we know?
Gay, gay gay. That's all there is to it. Now I ask you, would Jesus, who apparently made a big deal over hypocrisy, say anything derogatory about gay people? Well I wouldn't think so, would you?
