Measles is one of the diseases which has a lower mortality rate in countries with advanced medical systems but still has crippling side effects. Why don't we look at the before/after with some diseases with higher mortality rates.
Let's summarize again the results of the IOM study you keep pushing - the 2011 Adverse Effects of Vaccines: Evidence and Causality report from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) - "Of the 158 causality conclusions, the majority of cases (135 vaccine-adverse event pairs), the evidence was inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship. Overall, the committee concludes that few health problems are caused by or clearly associated with vaccines." Only eight of the pairs showed any correlation, and the probability of side effects were minimal compared to the benefit. I have never quoted or pushed a study from the medical industry on this thread, only the ones from the IOM.
Why should a vaccine be forced on kids for a disease that has a low mortality rate in the U.S. due to its advanced medical system but a high mortality rate in less advanced countries - Do you want your kid and their friends to be living as cripples for the remainder of their lives? The three likely medical consequences of measles are:
- Pneumonia (a serious lung infection)
- Lifelong brain damage
- Deafness
They say they cannot conclude whether the vaccines cause or do not cause the serious health problems. Would you mind explaining to me how they go from there to 'few health problems are caused by vaccines?' It is contradictory and makes zero sense. Like i said before. If a trader at GS said something like that, they'd get fired. Because it's their own money. But gov't workers can say anything and get away with it.
And about those measles. There may be a 'likely' consequence of those medical problems in other countries where they have no decent hygiene or medical care, but to say that it is 'likely' to have those things happen to you in the US if you get measles in just plain inaccurate. Not the truth.