Who is Responsible for Murdering over 40 Million people?

Quote from version77:

Taking life out of a woman's womb and killing it is not natural.

It is 'frickin Barbaric.

So is war, but you don't seem to mind that too much.

If a woman does not want a baby she shouldn't be having sex in the first place.
Oh yeah, this is exactly why people have sex. I don't suppose you have sex unless you want to have a child.

You are still avoiding the issue:

If you think that adoption is such a good alternative, then why don't you have any adopted children? How many of your "outraged" friends have adopted children?

Just exactly who do you think is going to take care of all these unwanted children you want to force women to have? You wouldn't mind a healthy increase in your taxes to provide the funds for their care would you?

People that are soooo "outraged" don't seem to have any good answers to solving the problem.
 
Quote from version77:

If a woman wants to make the decision to put a hanger up her
baby maker and kill it and it harms herself then fine.

Maybe it's nature's way of telling her she is trying to commit murder.
And teenagers? They don't do anything stupid, right? I don't suppose its a "barbaric" attitude to simply allow that to happen and simply say "oh well, see whatcha get"?

Wow, you are so sympathetic. There's no hypocrisy here!
 
Quote from Rearden Metal:

Seriously now, I'm surprised to see so many conservatives here who actually seem to want the gov't to outlaw abortion.

Wouldn't a more logical stance for you, be something like: "Abortion is an immoral act, a sin against God and all that- but still, it is not the proper role of gov't to intervene"?
Exactly. This breed of new conservatism doesn't actually seem to hate social programs as much as they say they do. Or do they actually know what one is?
 
Quote from riserburn:


Just exactly who do you think is going to take care of all these unwanted children you want to force women to have?

When a woman gets pregnant she could take care of the child.
Or give it up for adoption. Why is this so hard for you to understand?
 
Quote from riserburn:




Oh yeah, this is exactly why people have sex. I don't suppose you have sex unless you want to have a child.


Fortunately when I get my wife pregnant she has enough morals
to have the babies. She doesn't kill them...
 
Quote from version77:

When a woman gets pregnant she could take care of the child.
Or give it up for adoption. Why is this so hard for you to understand?
So a 14 or 17 year old can adequately take care of a child?

Who is going to adopt the child? You? Where are you going to find enough people that are willing to adopt? I see a lot of "outraged" people, but I don't see them lining up to adopt kids; otherwise there wouldn't be on average of 100,000+ in the system now.

Whats so hard about answering those questions if you seem to have all the answers?
 
Quote from version77:

Fortunately when I get my wife pregnant she has enough morals
to have the babies. She doesn't kill them...
Yes but you don't have sex unless you intend to have kids, right? After all, that was your logic for why all those women getting abortions were having sex to begin with.
 
Quote from riserburn:

So is war, but you don't seem to mind that too much.

You are still avoiding the issue:

If you think that adoption is such a good alternative, then why don't you have any adopted children? How many of your "outraged" friends have adopted children?

Just exactly who do you think is going to take care of all these unwanted children you want to force women to have? You wouldn't mind a healthy increase in your taxes to provide the funds for their care would you?

People that are soooo "outraged" don't seem to have any good answers to solving the problem.

You are trying to change the issue with the "War". I assume you
mean what is going on in Iraq. That war is over. Saddam is caught.

I have answered your repeated question a few times. READ.

Let me ask you a question? Why do you think "I" need to adopt
children? Because I believe in not killing babies because it is a
convenient way of getting out of a pregnancy? No harm done, just
a little dead baby... so what... blood... a little face... 2 eyes... who cares...
A lot of "people" making $$$ from abortions. Big business....

How many babies have you adopted? Do you have any kids?

Do you know how precious life is? Do you have any sympathy for life?

Sounds like you are the one outraged. I am only disgusted...

You sound like YOU want to avoid higher taxes if abortion is stopped since
YOU are the one who brought this up.

What a pity.

Save a few bucks and kill an unborn child. Unreal...:(
 
Quote from riserburn:

So a 14 or 17 year old can adequately take care of a child?

Who is going to adopt the child? You? Where are you going to find enough people that are willing to adopt? I see a lot of "outraged" people, but I don't see them lining up to adopt kids; otherwise there wouldn't be on average of 100,000+ in the system now.

Whats so hard about answering those questions if you seem to have all the answers?

Yes, a 14 or 17 year old can take care of a child with the help of
her family and friends. Happens all the time. And who says teenagers
are having most of the abortions?

There is not enough babies to be adopted by couples who want one.

Heck, a lot of couples have to adopt from other countries just to get
a baby!
 
Quote from riserburn:

Yes but you don't have sex unless you intend to have kids, right? After all, that was your logic for why all those women getting abortions were having sex to begin with.


If you are a woman and get pregnant, give the baby a chance to
live it's life instead of killing it. Not hard to understand.
 
Back
Top