Whining Little B****!

[gwb-trading]

So it is the Union's fault the people are not getting their paycheck? Nice deflection....

It is... after all... one of the primary responsibilities of the union... when the workers go on strike or are not being paid. In fact it is their number one responsibility in this situation and they completely failed in it (once again).

 

[El OchoCinco]

Wait...the reason the federal workers are not getting paid is because they went on strike?

You find the blame in this situation on the Unions because they created this situation?

Wow....you got Stephen King beat for fiction writer of the year.

 

[exGOPer]

It is... after all... one of the primary responsibilities of the union... when the workers go on strike or are not being paid. In fact it is their number one responsibility in this situation and they completely failed in it (once again).

Is there no situation or fact that you will not obfuscate or twist to defend the orange moron?

 

[userque]

The first and primary responsibility of the union in this situation is to provide union members zero interest loans or partial pay to cover their expenses while the employer is not providing compensation. After collecting all the union dues for years the union failed completely in this responsibility.

What did the union do with all the members money instead? They spend large chunks of it on political PACs to influence politicians.

This lawsuit has no chance of success and is a money-wasting publicity stunt to help the politicians the union has traditional supported. Many pundits have also stated that it is likely the lawsuit itself violates the law.

So tell me when the union is going to start meeting its primary responsibility of providing union members with zero interest loans or partial pay to cover their expenses?

Please cite your sources regarding 'the union's first and primary responsibility in this situation.'

Thanks

 

[CaptainObvious]

I can't blame the union or the workers for filing suit, waste of time as it may be. They have no fault in this fiasco. That falls squarely in the laps of a do nothing Congress who has kicked this issue around for decades while providing nothing but lip service.

 

[gwb-trading]

Please cite your sources regarding 'the union's first and primary responsibility in this situation.'

Thanks

Have you ever worked for a company with a union?

 

[El OchoCinco]

Have you ever worked for a company with a union?

I want to know what responsibility the Union has when the employer kicks the employees out of work and tells them they are not going to get paid over an issue they have nothing to do with versus the role/responsibility of the employer for doing it in the first place. Why does the employer get off scott free in your blame game?

Seems the employer is being the unfair one in that situation and why should the Union have to spend its money, collected from said employees? That is making the employees pay for what the employer is doing.

Seems you are taking the side of the employer in this case which is very unfair.

 

[userque]

Have you ever worked for a company with a union?

That's irrelevant to the discussion. But I'll consider any arguments to the contrary.

 

[userque]

Have you ever worked for a company with a union?

Just so no one starts to get confused, and since a simple question is seeming to morph into something convoluted--I'll try to keep it organized. Here's what we have so far:

1. You purported to know what 'the union's' responsibility was in the situation.
2. I asked for your sources.
3. You asked about my personal employment history.

Your sources should have nothing to do with a reader-of-your-post's employment history.

 

[El OchoCinco]

4. it is the Union's fault the workers are not getting paid.