Working with my current trading strategy and trying to optimize the system. Assuming there is one variable that can directly affect the number of trades, profit/loss, which is most important to you and why?
For ex. (just to clear up)
Let's say if 1x was used as the variable the results were (YTD):
Average profit/trade = .34%
Median profit/trade = .30%
Wins = 1731
Losses = 1304
Win % = 57%
Avg Win = 1.79%
Avg Loss = -1.60%
Avg Win/Avg Loss = 1.07
Total Buying Power Required for all trades for entire year = $60,740,000
Profit = $102,611
Now the variable is 2x:
Average profit/trade = .51% (+.17% higher than 1x)
Median profit/trade = .49% (+.19%)
Wins = 1061 (less trades triggered)
Losses = 719
Win % = 60% (+3%)
Avg Win = 1.99% (+.20%)
Avg Loss = -1.68% (-.08%)
Avg Win/Avg Loss = 1.19 (+.12)
Total Buying Power Required for all trades for entire year = $35,600,000
Profit = $90,529 (roughly -$10k)
My question becomes...are you more concerned with the bottom line (where 1x profits more than 2x), or are you more concerned with another ratio/number? What ratio/number/stat would you focus on (I do not have a statistics background, so I am sure I probably left out some very crucial calculations that could help me...that is where I need some input).
I mean from a common sense standpoint, I can look at this and say that 2x is a much better/efficient way b/c you lose $10k in profits, but you risk almost half the money in buying power over the year. But What if I have 50 different variables and want to pick the best one?
Thanks in advance.
For ex. (just to clear up)
Let's say if 1x was used as the variable the results were (YTD):
Average profit/trade = .34%
Median profit/trade = .30%
Wins = 1731
Losses = 1304
Win % = 57%
Avg Win = 1.79%
Avg Loss = -1.60%
Avg Win/Avg Loss = 1.07
Total Buying Power Required for all trades for entire year = $60,740,000
Profit = $102,611
Now the variable is 2x:
Average profit/trade = .51% (+.17% higher than 1x)
Median profit/trade = .49% (+.19%)
Wins = 1061 (less trades triggered)
Losses = 719
Win % = 60% (+3%)
Avg Win = 1.99% (+.20%)
Avg Loss = -1.68% (-.08%)
Avg Win/Avg Loss = 1.19 (+.12)
Total Buying Power Required for all trades for entire year = $35,600,000
Profit = $90,529 (roughly -$10k)
My question becomes...are you more concerned with the bottom line (where 1x profits more than 2x), or are you more concerned with another ratio/number? What ratio/number/stat would you focus on (I do not have a statistics background, so I am sure I probably left out some very crucial calculations that could help me...that is where I need some input).
I mean from a common sense standpoint, I can look at this and say that 2x is a much better/efficient way b/c you lose $10k in profits, but you risk almost half the money in buying power over the year. But What if I have 50 different variables and want to pick the best one?
Thanks in advance.