Which is the most important stat to you?

Working with my current trading strategy and trying to optimize the system. Assuming there is one variable that can directly affect the number of trades, profit/loss, which is most important to you and why?

For ex. (just to clear up)
Let's say if 1x was used as the variable the results were (YTD):

Average profit/trade = .34%
Median profit/trade = .30%
Wins = 1731
Losses = 1304
Win % = 57%
Avg Win = 1.79%
Avg Loss = -1.60%
Avg Win/Avg Loss = 1.07
Total Buying Power Required for all trades for entire year = $60,740,000
Profit = $102,611

Now the variable is 2x:
Average profit/trade = .51% (+.17% higher than 1x)
Median profit/trade = .49% (+.19%)
Wins = 1061 (less trades triggered)
Losses = 719
Win % = 60% (+3%)
Avg Win = 1.99% (+.20%)
Avg Loss = -1.68% (-.08%)
Avg Win/Avg Loss = 1.19 (+.12)
Total Buying Power Required for all trades for entire year = $35,600,000
Profit = $90,529 (roughly -$10k)

My question becomes...are you more concerned with the bottom line (where 1x profits more than 2x), or are you more concerned with another ratio/number? What ratio/number/stat would you focus on (I do not have a statistics background, so I am sure I probably left out some very crucial calculations that could help me...that is where I need some input).

I mean from a common sense standpoint, I can look at this and say that 2x is a much better/efficient way b/c you lose $10k in profits, but you risk almost half the money in buying power over the year. But What if I have 50 different variables and want to pick the best one?


Thanks in advance.
 
Hips, waists, and breast?

On a more serious note though, I tend to be more concerned with my drawdowns. How large are they vs my upswings. How long does it take to recover from a drawdown? How much of my return depends upon the market? Things like that are important to me. Plus Hips, Waists and Breasts.
 
Have a good idea of how and why the largest losses occur. This will reveal the biggest flaws of your method and keep you from being on an unnecessary roller coaster ride.
 
Ok let's try this again:

System 1
TOTAL PROFIT $154,626
AVERAGE/TRADE $57
MEDIAN/TRADE $58
WIN 1632
LOSE 1068
WIN % 60%
AVG WIN $220
AVG LOSS -$192
WIN/LOSS[abs value] 1.15
TOTAL BUYING POWER REQD $55,000,000
RETURN (profit/capital used) 0.29%
StdDev of the trades $294

System 2
TOTAL PROFIT $166,573
AVERAGE/TRADE $46
MEDIAN/TRADE $49
WIN 2130
LOSE 1484
WIN % 59%
AVG WIN $206
AVG LOSS -$184
WIN/LOSS[abs value] 1.12
TOTAL BUYING POWER REQD $73,000,000
RETURN (profit/capital used) 0.23%
StdDev of the trades $278


Which would you choose and why? Are there other calculations you would want to compare that are not listed that would help you decide?
 
Sharpe = (Annualized Rate of Return - Risk Free Rate of Return)/Annualized Standard Deviation of returns.

Sortino = (Annualized Rate of Return - Risk Free Rate of Return)/Annualized Down Standard Deviation of returns.

I don't know what you need to do to your data to calculate these, since I don't know what your data contains.
 
Back
Top