Which came first? The chicken or the egg?

So which came first?

  • The Chicken

    Votes: 20 74.1%
  • The Chicken Egg

    Votes: 7 25.9%

  • Total voters
    27
It is no more a flawed question than asking when does day turn into night....


Quote from Nihilanth:

After thinking about this more I have decided that the question is at fault as it assumes a definable point at which a non-chicken became a chicken.

It's like the equally flawed question "what race was the mother who gave birth to the first asian?"
 
It all depends-
on whether or not, the originating egg, was in a basket full of all the other eggs, upon which Zzz might place his bet.

Or, make an omelette.
 
Scrambled shit from the mouth of an asshole...

Quote from acronym:

It all depends-
on whether or not, the originating egg, was in a basket full of all the other eggs, upon which Zzz might place his bet.

Or, make an omelette.
 
They arrived simultaneously.

A chicken, by our definition, lays eggs. So, the chicken did not become a chicken until it laid its first egg. The instance that first egg was laid, it became a chicken, provided, of course, it fullfilled all the other prerequisites of being a chicken.

That's the way I sees it, anyways.

:)
 
Gosh, Zzzz even used the "scrambled", adjective , which i deliberately left out of my post, just to give him a standard comeback reply, all out of the goodness of my heart.

I told you my psychology is good, Zzzz.....


Poor Z, still geting depressed over reading kant, no doubt.
 
Psychology is good, which is why I wonder why you are not seeing a professional to assist you with your impairments and delusions?

Given the abnormal size of your big head, a head shrinker would have quite a challenge though to reduce it to a normal size...

Quote from acronym:

Gosh, Zzzz even used the "scrambled", adjective , which i deliberately left out of my post, just to give him a standard comeback reply, all out of the goodness of my heart.

I told you my psychology is good, Zzzz.....


Poor Z, still geting depressed over reading kant, no doubt.
 
A rooster is in fact a chicken, don't see them laying any eggs...yet a rooster is a chicken, right?

So your theory?

Zilch...

Quote from pattersb:

They arrived simultaneously.

A chicken, by our definition, lays eggs. So, the chicken did not become a chicken until it laid its first egg. The instance that first egg was laid, it became a chicken, provided, of course, it fullfilled all the other prerequisites of being a chicken.

That's the way I sees it, anyways.

:)
 
Back
Top