Indubitably. The question is "fowl."
Quote from Nihilanth:
After thinking about this more I have decided that the question is at fault as it assumes a definable point at which a non-chicken became a chicken.
It's like the equally flawed question "what race was the mother who gave birth to the first asian?"

Quote from acronym:
Gosh, Zzzz even used the "scrambled", adjective , which i deliberately left out of my post, just to give him a standard comeback reply, all out of the goodness of my heart.
I told you my psychology is good, Zzzz.....
Poor Z, still geting depressed over reading kant, no doubt.
Quote from pattersb:
They arrived simultaneously.
A chicken, by our definition, lays eggs. So, the chicken did not become a chicken until it laid its first egg. The instance that first egg was laid, it became a chicken, provided, of course, it fullfilled all the other prerequisites of being a chicken.
That's the way I sees it, anyways.
![]()