Hey dipshit, blow off....
Which came first? The chicken or the egg?
- Thread starter ZZZzzzzzzz
- Start date
This is not about probability or possibility, duh...
This is about me having 3 billion years worth of physical data,
and you having absolutely nothing, nada, zilch, nichts, sans.....
And you are telling me to have a open mind ? je je je
you are funny!!
This is about me having 3 billion years worth of physical data,
and you having absolutely nothing, nada, zilch, nichts, sans.....
And you are telling me to have a open mind ? je je je
you are funny!!
I don't question the data at all.
I question the scientists who weave theories with huge holes in them, then offer them up as a "proof."
Hey, believe whatever you like, but it is still a belief system....
p.s.
Score:
Chicken 11
Egg 4
I question the scientists who weave theories with huge holes in them, then offer them up as a "proof."
Hey, believe whatever you like, but it is still a belief system....
p.s.
Score:
Chicken 11
Egg 4
Excerpt:
"Cecil Adams' response was only correct for one interpretation of the question. That interpretation is a question of whether eggs of any sort existed before chickens of any sort. His interpretation is only useful if you intend to be a smart-ass by answering the letter of the question rather than the common interpretation. The more common interpretation of this question is whether chicken eggs existed before chickens themselves. That is the question that TFA seeks to answer.
BTW, I also answered this question years ago (though not before '84). All it got me was dumb stares from the people I told it to. Now that my answer has been "officially confirmed" I expect nothing but head scratching and comments like, "I don't remember you saying anything like that at all."
The answer is actaully quite obvious from an evolutionary perspective. If evolution happens between generations, then what came before the first chicken egg had to be a non-chicken. Thus the egg came first."
TW
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/05/26/1738217&from=rss
**************
"Cecil Adams' response was only correct for one interpretation of the question. That interpretation is a question of whether eggs of any sort existed before chickens of any sort. His interpretation is only useful if you intend to be a smart-ass by answering the letter of the question rather than the common interpretation. The more common interpretation of this question is whether chicken eggs existed before chickens themselves. That is the question that TFA seeks to answer.
BTW, I also answered this question years ago (though not before '84). All it got me was dumb stares from the people I told it to. Now that my answer has been "officially confirmed" I expect nothing but head scratching and comments like, "I don't remember you saying anything like that at all."
The answer is actaully quite obvious from an evolutionary perspective. If evolution happens between generations, then what came before the first chicken egg had to be a non-chicken. Thus the egg came first."
TW
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/05/26/1738217&from=rss
**************
Hardly...
What you "got" is your dick in your hands...
What you "got" is your dick in your hands...
Officially confirmed?
Who designated the official the confirmed this?
Oh yeah, a club of scientists....
Show me a non chicken laying a chicken egg...
Updated score:
Chicken 12
Egg 4
Proof positive that non chicken laid chicken egg: zero
Who designated the official the confirmed this?
Oh yeah, a club of scientists....
Show me a non chicken laying a chicken egg...
Updated score:
Chicken 12
Egg 4
Proof positive that non chicken laid chicken egg: zero
You asked for it.....
<img src=http://dangas.grenouilles.free.fr/pages/timbres%20grenouilles/images/MONTSERRAT%20-%203.50%20dollars%20-%20Moutain%20chicken%20-%20non%20oblitere.jpg>
<img src=http://dangas.grenouilles.free.fr/pages/timbres%20grenouilles/images/MONTSERRAT%20-%203.50%20dollars%20-%20Moutain%20chicken%20-%20non%20oblitere.jpg>