Where can I go for funding?

Good Morning Concinnity,

This very true. Very true. I have a friend live in Nigeria sitting on 3 million cash, he trades a bit in forex not very good at it, but he do anything to grow that captial in a real trading edge or someone who can grow it for him.

I have always believed that the trading game is the best business in the world.

Bro this is the first post you've made I just can't give the thumbs up on. It hurts that we're on opposite sides for once, hopefully our relationship maintains throughout this test, but what I said it's just too true.
 
Bro this is the first post you've made I just can't give the thumbs up on. It hurts that we're on opposite sides for once, hopefully our relationship maintains throughout this test, but what I said it's just too true.
Good Morning Concinnity,

I was agreeing with your comments you posted.

The trader with a proven back record owns the world. I agree with you.

What about my post you do not like?
 
That you have a friend with 3 million cash and you haven't hooked me up with that connection yet.
Hello Concinnity,

LMFAO HAHAHAHAHAHAH That is funny. Well, if you have an algo that you can prove to him can make him $1 million in less than 2 years, he would love to speak to you.

His demands is millions only.

He made about $4 million in the forex market with an algo. Let's just say he got very lucky with that algo.
 
I've traded futures for 50 years, and used computers to trade, having run millions of tests on various U.S. futures.
I looked quickly, and I doubt anybody would fund based on those results:
1. One year is a short period, but more significant is that there are only 12 trades;
4. In the real world, over time, almost nobody has 83% profitable trades, nor only goes through a 3.9% drawdown, nor has 100% winning months.

BTW, if you have "achieved similar results for years," I would think you would have sufficient trading capital.
%%
3 years = minimum;
10 years or 20+ = much better, certain to include a bull + bear cycle.
Dave ramsey helps a lot;
but he never uses leverage, even in business, but he went bankrupt using sounded like extreme leverage.
I fund my trading-investing with my business profits .
Investors or RE + business people may get83% profitable investments;
3.9% DD may work a year.
3 years or 10 years; most likely much more DD\ even with cash or mix of leverage + cash ETFs.
Also money market 2024 has 0.00% drawdown; most money is made with bigger DD.
:caution::caution::caution::caution::caution::caution:,:caution::caution::caution::caution::caution::caution:
 
(Regarding online prop firms) They run a business, not a charity. So the most logical reasoning would state they need to turn a profit to stay in business. Also the major prop firms that have been around do pay out:
---- Topstep(they will even eventually move you live)
----- APEX(Not as clear on when they move to live)
------Earn2Trade(Will also move you live and eventually give a generous FIXED stop loss. No live trailing and no end of day.
------Uprofit is another smaller but never had any issues or heard of issues of them not paying.

All these companies have a great track record of paying...
.


Ty for the reply. Unfortunately, they cater for MT5 trading on forex and some CFD equity indexes and major stocks. I require other futures, than what they provide for

< If you're using a mathematical and skill approach, it's fairly high probability that what you're doing should work on nearly every tradable asset including futures. >.

I can't come close to agreeing with that. Obviously, different instruments have unique characteristics and yet their trading may still be mathematically and skill based

< The glorified scam thing is really only true if you can't intra-day trade at a high level.

No, I don't primarily trade intra-day (I do sometimes) and no that shouldn't be a requirement

< So, how is it truly a scam if they pay out? >

High Spreads
Limited instruments
Implausible conditions that are beyond the performance of even successful hedgefunds
intolerance to occasional drawdown that's consistent with an OK r/r operation

< If you think the drawdown is an issue the a solution could be you could copy trade multiple accounts and just use 1 micro on each. That way you can trade more size, while still having plenty of room to let your edge play out. >

Interesting solution! But it'd require a large capital trade relative to gain
 
Back
Top