Hi All,
Attached are my results, I have achieved similar live trades for years.
But what can I do about funding?
I've looked into the BS prop funding and they're glorified scams.
There ought to be a funding solution, please let me know of one
There ought to be a funding solution, please let me know of one
Hi All,
Attached are my results, I have achieved similar live trades for years.
But what can I do about funding?
I've looked into the BS prop funding and they're glorified scams.
There ought to be a funding solution, please let me know of one
I get where you’re coming from. Trading other people’s money and getting a percentage of the gains (…and not sharing the losses) is the best scenario that a trader could be in. If you can trade 10x your personal account size using OPM while keeping 20% of the gains for yourself it would double the rate of return on your funds. The only problem is market volume. When the AUM gets large enough some of yours strategies may not be possible due to volume. You’d have to spread it out over additional trades and that will likely drop your performance.
I've traded futures for 50 years, and used computers to trade, having run millions of tests on various U.S. futures.
I looked quickly, and I doubt anybody would fund based on those results:
1. One year is a short period, but more significant is that there are only 12 trades;
2. I assume the trades were from the long side -- in a year when most stock markets were also higher, or if short, many markets -- SP, crude, grain, cocoa, sugar, coffee futures -- were trending.
3. But above aside, the major negative is the 83% winning trades. Other than micro-second computer traders, the best human traders maybe are profitable on 50% of their trades; 1/3 is more likely.
4. In the real world, over time, almost nobody has 83% profitable trades, nor only goes through a 3.9% drawdown, nor has 100% winning months.
In my futures trading models, if any system produced more than 75% profitable trades, I immediately discarded it, knowing if it worked in future, it would be just briefly.
BTW, if you have "achieved similar results for years," I would think you would have sufficient trading capital.
There are funding solutions but the high prices they charge combined with the demands and aggravation to get approved will likely make you think funding is not worth it. You might check out https://percent.com/ I don't know what % they will expect but i can share my experience apart from stock trading funding.
On my regular business we pay 6% per month to ad agencies for a line of credit to buy media (online advertising) with most payments due 30 days after the month of activity. Even at that rate it's not easy to get approved.
Or amounts to 6% per month. Some agencies I must prepay and when I send them $100k they credit me for $94k. Credit is expensive because of the risk involved.
Good Morning Q.E.D.,I've traded futures for 50 years, and used computers to trade, having run millions of tests on various U.S. futures.
I looked quickly, and I doubt anybody would fund based on those results:
1. One year is a short period, but more significant is that there are only 12 trades;
2. I assume the trades were from the long side -- in a year when most stock markets were also higher, or if short, many markets -- SP, crude, grain, cocoa, sugar, coffee futures -- were trending.
3. But above aside, the major negative is the 83% winning trades. Other than micro-second computer traders, the best human traders maybe are profitable on 50% of their trades; 1/3 is more likely.
4. In the real world, over time, almost nobody has 83% profitable trades, nor only goes through a 3.9% drawdown, nor has 100% winning months.
In my futures trading models, if any system produced more than 75% profitable trades, I immediately discarded it, knowing if it worked in future, it would be just briefly.
BTW, if you have "achieved similar results for years," I would think you would have sufficient trading capital.
There is a lot of money out there wanting to be traded. If he wants a 24 hour solution (which there is one that isn't even a bad deal **if you can actually day trade at a high level**) than the very simple, straightforward and cost effective answer would be choosing whichever well established online prop firm best fits his needs.
If he needs to hold positions overnight and rely on time and other factors to turn a profit not necessarily related to day trading skill, than he is going to need to get creative and pound the pavement networking and building relationships by surrounding himself with other people that trade, are in the financial markets or have risk capital they are looking to apply somewhere. Has to make himself stand out by doing something like trading live in front of people, having a really good pitch or explaining in a unique way what separates him from everyone else. It is do able but of course you may have to aggressively network for a year before an opportunity arises.
Otherwise he is left with his current option. Continue to trade his own money and build results. If he still isn't where he wants to be or wants to grow more than the more results he builds the greater his odds are of going a more traditional route.