Whats all this the polls were rigged stuff?

Actually the real problem is that the majority of these polls showed that Hillary would easily win the necessary electoral votes state-by-state.


National polls don't show that.State polls do but are cheaper, inferior,and often done by different polling companies,news stations and colleges.Look at the different pollsters between the state and national polls.I think people thought the popular vote winner would win because only 3 presidents in history had won without winning the popular vote.


image.jpg


image.jpg


image.jpg
 
Last edited:
Massive illegal immigrant voting in California makes the popular vote citation dubious at best and outright fraudulent at its worst.
"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it."-Joseph Goebbels




“If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed.” ― Adolf Hitler
 
National polls don't show that.State polls do but are cheaper, inferior,and often done by different polling companies,news stations and colleges.Look at the different pollsters between the state and national polls.I think people thought the popular vote winner would win because only 3 presidents in history had won without winning the popular vote.


image.jpg


image.jpg


image.jpg

Actually it's happened 4 times (5 if you count Trump) Adams, Hayes, Harrison, Bush and Trump. Funny how despite having access to readily available information you get information like this wrong. It's basically happened 10% of the time and the fact that it happened less than 20 years ago once before should've been on everyones mind. I mean, I certainly thought Trump might win the popular vote but not the electoral at one point simply based on his rallies being packed with 10s of thousands of people and Hillary couldn't even get a few hundred to hers.
 
Actually it's happened 4 times (5 if you count Trump) Adams, Hayes, Harrison, Bush and Trump. Funny how despite having access to readily available information you get information like this wrong. It's basically happened 10% of the time and the fact that it happened less than 20 years ago once before should've been on everyones mind. I mean, I certainly thought Trump might win the popular vote but not the electoral at one point simply based on his rallies being packed with 10s of thousands of people and Hillary couldn't even get a few hundred to hers.


Since I was discussing events prior to Trump winning the election I said 3.Since Adams was elected by the House of Reps and the chance of that happening with 2 candidates rather than 4 like in Adams day might be zilch I didn't include him.
 
Did she win the electoral vote like they said she would?


Where in the national polls did they say she would win the EC vote? Sure its implied because the popular vote winner usually wins but the EC vote is not what they are trying to predict.
 
Where in the national polls did they say she would win the EC vote? Sure its implied because the popular vote winner usually wins but the EC vote is not what they are trying to predict.

Just go through the polls state-by-state for all 50 states and D.C. They were predicting a Hillary win in the EC.
 
Just go through the polls state-by-state for all 50 states and D.C. They were predicting a Hillary win in the EC.


I already stated state polls aren't as reliable as national ones.They are not as thorough and most of them are done by different pollsters than the national polls.
 
Final polls had Hillary +3,she won by + 2.The super majority of national polls in 2016 showed more people would vote for Hillary,and nearly 3 million more people did vote for Hillary.The polls were right.Hillary just got screwed by a system that lets a candidate win even though more people voted for another candidate.


image.jpg
Yeah, just like a libtard, it is everything and everyone else's fault regarding Hillary's loss. It can't be the Hillary ran a bad campaign and didn't campaign in the correct states.
 
Back
Top