You're confusing the concept of liberalism, which is what's defined here, with derived beliefs or principles that many liberals may hold. The problem is, they may not agree among themselves on those secondary (here I mean derived, not unimportant) principles. So your attack is invalid.
Then give me YOUR definition of liberal so I can judge whether or not the definition I accept is valid.
You're substituting your own Christian belief with a generic definition of Christianity. I respect your belief. However, you cannot force me to use your belief to define Christianity.
How do you know where I get my definition of Christianity from? In typical liberal fashion you have taken it upon yourself to put words in my mouth because you cannot bring yourself to concede the truthfulness of the actual words I have spoken.
The definition I accept is the definition that was in use the first time the word Christian was used- Acts 11:26 â¦And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.
When this word was first used the people who were identified as Christians believed that Jesus of Nazareth was conceived by the Holy Ghost and born of a Virgin and that He is both fully a man and fully God and that He lived a sinless life while on earth and that He was crucified under Pontius Pilate to provide an atoning sacrifice for human sin and that He rose from the dead after 3 days whereupon He showed Himself to His followers over a period of 40 days before ascending bodily into Heaven with the promise that He would return.
Not everyone who claims to be a Christian today has all of these beliefs.