What really happened ....11 september

lmaoooooooo.... hey guys you have met your match. meet hiroshi the giant pancake man... he loves pancake theories that even his own side has avoided like kate moss at the shoneys breakfast bar.
 
Quote from ratboy88:

lmaoooooooo.... hey guys you have met your match. meet hiroshi the giant pancake man... he loves pancake theories that even his own side has avoided like kate moss at the shoneys breakfast bar.

Amazing you keep obsessing on this pancake thing... Get over it.
 
Quote from vermin77:

Amazing you keep obsessing on this pancake thing... Get over it.

omfg, listen who's talking...half of this sadpants posts are wild accusations of anti-americanism even to his own side and if that wasn't enough of a broken record he felt compelled to dedicate a whole thread to it...total hypocrite.
 
Demolished or not, there is very clear proof that 9/11 was known about by government intelligence, more specifically, the FBI. So I would not put it past the Bush admin & the neocons to ensure a collapse of the two buildings.

www.sec.gov has it, just requires a little searching. I could post the exact link, but what's the fun in that. I have little interest in educating the stubborn & stupid sheep.

There is more proof out there, like the encounter between the Israeli Mossad and the FBI, but it is less conclusive evidence. Nothing beats when one of the scumbag corrupt regulatory agencies established by those in power, ends up pursuing something like this before the matter is quickly muted. The brainwashed and clueless pawns of the institution were just doing their job.

Gotta love it when bureaucracy screws itself.
 
already posted all the links and facts about 911 insider trading...discussed ad nasueam too!.:)


check this very thread for additional insite -what really happened...sept11- and for insider trading the -ask questions demand answers- thread...there's tons of info there.
Quote from Hydroblunt:

Demolished or not, there is very clear proof that 9/11 was clearly known about by government intelligence, more specifically, the FBI. So I would not put it past the Bush admin & the neocons to ensure a collapse of the two buildings.

www.sec.gov has it, just requires a little searching. I could post the exact link, but what's the fun in that. I have little interest in educating the stubborn sheep.

Gotta love it when buearocracy screws itself.
 
Quote from BVM88:

Thanks for the links, but IMO, much of it is unconfirmed and none of it fully explains how building 7 not only became the first steel framed building in history to have been brought down by fire but also how it could have fallen in about 7 seconds (from when it started collapsing, as fast as a billiard ball being dropped from the top). I suggest that you watch the Silverstein interview again, look at his expression and actually listen to what he said before relying on the opinions of others. God gave you eyes to see with, ears to hear with and a brain to think with. You can see him towards the end in this video: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-999558027849894376&q=911+Mysteries+-+Demolitions After looking at the interview if you still believe the reports that he really said something else, then you'll believe anything IMO.

The other two videos in the series are here: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1162851149755261569&sourceid=zeitgeist
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7143212690219513043&q=911+Mysteries+-+Demolitions


You will also find plenty of actual video taped interviews with firemen, engineers etc above (and scattered all over the internet) that in my mind leave many serious questions begging for an answer

What is unconfirmed? Doesn't the video confirm that the smoke came from 7? Do you doubt that the firemen said those things about the damage to 7 and their reaction to it?

So it appears like you are being a Mr empty mind also. I've shown you the evidence, and since it doesn't fit your preconceived notions of what you want to hear, it is dismissed without investigating that there has, in fact, been other steel buildings that failed due to fire. And that 7 didn't fall in 7 seconds.

I could go on, but what would be the point.....

You are a TRUE BELIEVER .....
 
tough to trust a site that in its first page and first opening paragraph lies blatantly and obviously on purpose about historical facts. hint hint--the madrid bldg was never on fire.
Quote from Haroki:

What is unconfirmed? Doesn't the video confirm that the smoke came from 7? Do you doubt that the firemen said those things about the damage to 7 and their reaction to it?

So it appears like you are being a Mr empty mind also. I've shown you the evidence, and since it doesn't fit your preconceived notions of what you want to hear, it is dismissed without investigating that there has, in fact, been other steel buildings that failed due to fire. And that 7 didn't fall in 7 seconds.

I could go on, but what would be the point.....

You are a TRUE BELIEVER .....
 
Quote from version77:

Amazing you keep obsessing on this pancake thing... Get over it.

He can't help it...

Much like the nicotine addict when they have a cig

Or an adrenaline addict when they jump from a plane

Or a heroin addict when they take their hit

Arguing these weak points obviously give him some kind of rush - endorphins perhaps - that are in some way gratifying to him.

He's just a junkie....
 
Back
Top