What really happened ....11 september

Quote from deadbear:

Actually I agree that the two events don't add up to 5. To me its all the evidence that points to 9-11 as an inside job. I am curious as to what real investigating you have done. I don't believe you ever really considered 9-11 as an inside job. Your namecalling here gives you away.What in your world could explain the towers coming down so fast? They were built to withstand this type of aircrash.Where was our world's best air defense system that day? What about the eyewitnesses that heard and felt the bombs going off that day? Ect Ect

Funny, all of those questions have been reasonably answered here :

http://www.debunking911.com/

and other linked sites.....

And yet, I'm the one that hasn't done any research...

You seem a little more logical, so let me explain how this works, since others don't seem to have much of a brain, or they're too scared to argue their point on the merits of their evidence.

1. - Cters have a question about ... A

2. - those sites will respond with... B

Now, to refute B, you need to come up with statement... C. And in C, you must show a logical reason why B should be discounted. And if you can't come up with C.........

A few questions - have you seen that from any of the Cters? Or is their modus operandi to say 'LOLOLOL'..... or 'watch the Goole video'.... Or to shout 'Wake up sheeple'...

If you want to impress a few here, come up with C..... I double dog dare you.....

I'll even give you a starting place. Why the towers came down as fast as they did is fully explained at the above site, and at other sites linked there. Read their explanation, do some research from the CT side, and use that research to explain WHY the debunking explanation should be discounted.

And I don't believe it and LOL won't cut it either, bro.....
 
Quote from Pabst:

Ok, I'm coming clean. Like many of you on ET, in the media, military, federal and local governments, and scientific community, I have received compensation from the U.S. Government in exchange for "keeping quiet" about 9/11. Flight 77? Never happened. Ted Olson was tired of his wife's yacking so we concocted the whole flight. Clearly the hole in the Pentagon wasn't big enough even for a disintegrating aircraft. Our engineers "measured" wrong. Happens. The service station owner who says he saw the plane impact into the Pentagon? Let's just say he's charging the highest prices for premium unleaded in all of Virginia without any FTC hindrance. We also gave him a nice tip to buy NYMEX futures last spring. He's doing very well, thank you.

Of course many of you know by now that we had to shoot down Flight 93. Actually it wasn't originally part of our "plot" but sometimes Rummie likes to go for the "human angle" and the notion of heroic passengers commandeering a plane from the hijackers was just to good of a hook. Plus it kept media coverage tied up in knots. That's why you see made for TV movies about 93 and NOT about WTC 7.

Up in New York things went like clockwork. Ever hear those rumors that the reason so few Jews were killed in the Trade Center was because they were tipped by Israeli intelligence? Not exactly true. Rather Mr. Silverstien did give some well placed hints that 9/11 was the real Yom Kippur and that atonement did NOT include yield curve arbitrage that Tuesday. From Long Island to the Upper West Side that fateful morning it was virtually impossible to get near a Deli that sold a tongue on rye. Nice work Larry!

Downtown we had to lay the payola out thicker than thieves. We'd already told the FDNY that demolition of the twin towers would not start until three hours after our jets had made impact. You can imagine how pissed off the brass was when they found out about those 80 WTC elevator mechanics leaving the scene immediately. When we explained how the firefighters union will never have to fight again for another pay raise, they calmed down a bit. The cops were a little harder to appease and now with Kerik's nomination up in flames we'll have to sweeten the pot down the road. Not to worry though. New York's finest are great guys and without them turning a blind eye, publicly at least, we'd never have pulled this off.

We got to Hillary early, well before , in 2000. We got Rudy out of the Senate race and gave her a clear win. One problem though is we promised both her AND Rudy the White House in 2008. We'll see if maybe something can't be worked out, after all Rudy's too moderate for the GOP ticket anyway.

The media whores of course went snooping. Peter Jennings? Let's just say his lung cancer wasn't from cigarettes if you get my drift. Howard Stern was REALLY getting to be a pain in the ass. FCC fines, nothing would keep that big mouth quiet. He hears things and we worried he'd make into some sort of Lesbian implosion dial a date. Fortunately we were able to get him a divorce and nine figures from Sirius. The King of all Media is stoked! Hillary was a big help getting this shit past the Demo minority in Congress. Thank God she'd had the foresight to shoot that video of Boxer, Feinstein and Pelosi getting it on in front of her after that L.A. fundraiser. No siree, you won't hear a peep from those Dems.

I forgot, yes FEMA. Of COURSE the report was a whitewash. But then Brown started acting all high and mighty. When we forced out O'Neill (thanks for the assist Bono) Brown started saying shit like if he wasn't the new Treasury secretary he'd spill the beans. Because of that incompetent ego-maniac we had to spend almost five years working on Katrina. Do you think it's easy diverting a Cat4 to the Big Easy? Hell we had to start a record number of storms before we nailed it. Good thing we slowed down Rita. That one was pure rogue and POTUS would have been real pissed if we accidently took out Houston. Notice how Brown quit on Sept. 12th this year. The Muslims have their "anniversary" dates and we have ours too.


Me I used my noggin. Where as the Port authority and FDNY guys took their payoffs in depreciating dollars I asked for and got liquid gold. HAL. Euro denominated to boot. Baby.
 
Quote from Haroki:



1. - Cters have a question about ... A

2. - those sites will respond with... B

Now, to refute B, you need to come up with statement... C. And in C, you must show a logical reason why B should be discounted. And if you can't come up with C.........

Logic? Rationale? What part of "I saw it on Google Video" do you not understand?

Quote from bsmeter2:

Little Nikike

To be totally honest, I am kind of disappointed. It was better when there was a chance that you actually believed this stuff. If you're just another brain-dead cunt of a bigot, all the fun sort of goes out of it. After all, brain-dead cunt bigots (like you) typically don't believe all the garbage they spew - they do it because it gives them sexual gratification.

bsboy's little meter is rising as he thinks of dead Jews. C'mon little meter!!
 
Quote from Haroki:

Funny, all of those questions have been reasonably answered here :

http://www.debunking911.com/

and other linked sites.....

And yet, I'm the one that hasn't done any research...

You seem a little more logical, so let me explain how this works, since others don't seem to have much of a brain, or they're too scared to argue their point on the merits of their evidence.

1. - Cters have a question about ... A

2. - those sites will respond with... B

Now, to refute B, you need to come up with statement... C. And in C, you must show a logical reason why B should be discounted. And if you can't come up with C.........

A few questions - have you seen that from any of the Cters? Or is their modus operandi to say 'LOLOLOL'..... or 'watch the Goole video'.... Or to shout 'Wake up sheeple'...

If you want to impress a few here, come up with C..... I double dog dare you.....

I'll even give you a starting place. Why the towers came down as fast as they did is fully explained at the above site, and at other sites linked there. Read their explanation, do some research from the CT side, and use that research to explain WHY the debunking explanation should be discounted.

And I don't believe it and LOL won't cut it either, bro.....

So its the battle of websites i see. I can provide you several websites that debunk your debunking attempt.. But I asked you a few questions and you provide me this. Why do you believe our government? Simple question.

PS. Bombs were felt and heard that day my friend. No way did those towers fall that fast at near freefall speed as alleged on your websites.How come so much debris was thrown out almost 500 feet way from the towers and where are the pancakes? Why was everything reduced to powder?Too much energy was expended to do the results from just a collapse, A total collapse at that.Do you know how improbable a total collapse as it that speed? No website will ever explain all this away.
 
Quote from deadbear:

How come so much debris was thrown out almost 500 feet way from the towers and where are the pancakes? Why was everything reduced to powder.

Clearly you've never seen footage of, or made the effort to learn about the science behind a big landslide. If you had, you would know, even in a non-scientific way, that large volumes of solid matter moving at high speeds start to behave exactly like liquids. The only thing that's surprising is that the 'wave' of material splashing out at the foot of the buildings didn't travel farther than 500 feet.

Imagine a column of water as high as the trade centres. Now imagine it suddenly collapsing straight down. Get the picture?

Re: why was everything reduced to small rubble... is this a serious question? One thing that has become abundantly clear is that the intersection between the set of structural engineers and the set of CT nutbags is 0.

Anyhow... this has been posted as a refutation countless times. The CT'ers just plug their ears and say 'We can't hear you'. It's much sexier, after all, to imagine a huge conspiracy involving that well known heroin trafficker, George Bush Senior, Osama and KBR, the International Zionist Bankers, and the man in the Moon.
 
each floor would have given resistance ... the 2 big problems of the fantasy pancake theory is speed due to this resistance ... and if everything resulted into dust.. which it did in fact do.... then what force kept collapsing the floors? there were no concrete floors after the collapse.... just dust.. this includes all furniture, computers, everything except the steelbeams which mysteriously had 45 degree angled cuts. unfortunately this evidence was removed from the crime scene illegally by rudy almost immediately. which by the way is a felony.
 
Quote from deadbear:

So its the battle of websites i see. I can provide you several websites that debunk your debunking attempt.. .

So.... provide them.... give me your answer C

Otherwise, it's all about your beliefs......
 
Quote from traderNik:

Clearly you've never seen footage of, or made the effort to learn about the science behind a big landslide. If you had, you would know, even in a non-scientific way, that large volumes of solid matter moving at high speeds start to behave exactly like liquids. The only thing that's surprising is that the 'wave' of material splashing out at the foot of the buildings didn't travel farther than 500 feet.


wow.... you guys win. i just saw the light... if the twin towers were liquid, that explains everything. freefall of water.... great analogy.

please show me one photo or video of stacked floors at the base of ground zero??? for your theory to hold water (pun intended), there would need to be evidence of this great force. that mimicked water.

(sigh) we have been debating fools, that makes us the losers.

wtcpancakes.jpg
 
not to mention only the outside square was concrete.. the core was made up of extemely thick steel beams, with 45 degree angled cuts in them.

ihop.jpg
 
Quote from ratboy88:

wow.... you guys win. i just saw the light... if the twin towers were liquid, that explains everything. freefall of water.... great analogy.

please show me one photo or video of stacked floors at the base of ground zero??? for your theory to hold water (pun intended), there would need to be evidence of this great force. that mimicked water.

(sigh) we have been debating fools, that makes us the losers.

wtcpancakes.jpg


you haven't been debating anyone. you've simply been laughed at.

to believe there was a massive conspiracy, one would have to really, really want to believe in one.

"the floors pancaked" is your proof????

do a quick calculation of the potential energy stored in 20 floors 1/4 mile in the air. What do you think, they'd just stop in mid-air after the initial floors gave way?

this thread is a cesspool of stupidity, much like all of them.
 
Back
Top