Quote from Equalizer:
Really?! Can you provide some concrete examples perhaps to back up that statement (or should I say assumption?).
You should have included my preceding paragraph as well. Whereas there can be no doubt about the correctness of the results in probability theory as applied to the games of chance, the latter are understood to adhere to rigorous and unambiguous models - for "fair games" at least.
It should be obvious that "Market Modelling" is an outright cacophony. Examples? You can't be serious, you follow these threads like I do. Did you ever encounter a market "adhering to a rigorous and unambiguous proposed model"? If you know about one, please tell me. I must have missed that one. We'll talk further later.