What is the difference between traders using TA and tapereading?

I have been trading FX and indices (mainly DAX) now for almost a year using techincal analysis. I know that a lot of daytraders trading stocks uses tapereading, many hardly even use technical analysis. Still I have not understood what tapereading is all about for daytraders. What exactly is a tapereader trying to see compared to a technical analyst? For technical analysis it´s obvious what we're looking for, trends, breakouts, support and resistance etc. But what does a tapereader look for to base his descisions on, and are there any similarities?
 
"What is the difference between traders using TA and tapereading?"

TA trader starts to need glasses at 10,000 hours and tape reader has coke thick glasses and head aches reading price at 15,000 hours. In all the years of reading the Dome/Volume, I have spotted two patterns that is useful, but not going to share.
 
I would say with tape reading you look a bit more at the volume traded per tick, so you can gage direct orderflow and aggressiveness.... although that sounds more like DOM than tape

TA is lines and patterns, Tape is more price action I think.
 
Both methods you mention ed are limited and do not represent viable alternatives. Modern traders use quant tools. If you want to compete in quant trading world you must get away from old methods and get some advanced tools. Take a look at this blog to see how some quant traders estimate probabilities. Trading is probability.
 
Used to stare at the DOM for hours, felt like seconds though time really goes quick with that up, I see no real value in it but I wasn't a full on scalper back then.
 
Tapereading is about watching how orders are processed, that's it. There is no pattern, there is just pieces of the puzzle in a larger context. That's how Tape Reading differs from TA and charts, because charts are just crutches in order to get a quick glance at the big picture.

As long as there is a consolidated Time&Sales, Tape reading will always be relevant, because you can see who is trading (see a bunch of sub penny prints, guess who just got executed...), how much is trading, how big the orders are and when activity picks up.

Don't believe all this "it's not usefull because of HFT" crap
 
I feel like most tape readers nowadays are dudes who learned tapereading long ago, used it their whole life and are too old now to learn more complex yet effective techniques.
 
What exactly is a tapereader trying to see compared to a technical analyst?

The theory is, the markets move as a result of limit and market orders being submitted, cancelled, and executed. Most markets these days operate using order matching with the LOB (limit order book). LOB is effectively a double-auction mechanism where anyone can buy and sell. Tape-reading is interpreting the order flow with the intent to determine the future order flow and thus the future prices. Technical analysis, on the other hand, is traditionally the study of price and volume (not the orders).

Think of a doctor who wants to diagnose a disease. One way to do it is to look at the symptoms. Let's say a patient has characteristic itchy blisters, nausea, and headaches. The doctor recognizes this pattern of symptoms and determines the disease: it's chickenpox. This would be equivalent to applying the technical analysis to the market (as in, for example, fast moving average crossing above slow moving average). Another way is to look at a blood sample to see if you can spot the actual virus that causes chickenpox. That would be equivalent to tape-reading.

That is, order flow is the source, and price/volume are the symptoms (or perhaps "manifestations" is a better word).
 
A pretty decent analogy, dude. However I still wonder why everyone still mixes tapereading with watching the limit order book. Time&Sales first, then watch how the book reacts to the transactions.
 
Back
Top