Are you quoting a spiritual song?
Kum ba yah, my Lord, Kum ba yah
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kumbaya
At least, spell it right, otherwise you're dumber than sh*t (in keeping with the theme of this thread).
What is happening to men?
- Thread starter nitro
- Start date
Are you quoting a spiritual song?
Kum ba yah, my Lord, Kum ba yah
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kumbaya
At least, spell it right, otherwise you're dumber than sh*t (in keeping with the theme of this thread).
One that was catastrophically missed by the great french schools.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Évariste_Galois
His life has movie written all over it. Who would play the young Galois? Who in today's world of young men could pass for a fiery genius of the highest order convincingly?
Hey wait a minute I know shit!
Damn. Your hatred for poetry just make you sound both ignorant and dumb.
my theory is that. I think the feminist messed up the entire world.
they caused inflation and forced all the families to have 2 jobs.
they make us plunder and hurt our mother earth at 2x rate.
dumb bitches might say without us working, you will never enjoy the technological advances that you enjoy so much today.
well, 12 years ago i thought my pentium-133 computer was like blazing fast and couldn't ask for more. 20 years ago i thought my 20 inch cathode rate tube TV was awesome.
so the point i try to make is that. you would never know what it is like till you had a taste of it like smoking, sex. I will be content and happier with a less technological advanced world where the air is cleaner, summer is cooler and lastly bitches know their places.
they caused inflation and forced all the families to have 2 jobs.
they make us plunder and hurt our mother earth at 2x rate.
dumb bitches might say without us working, you will never enjoy the technological advances that you enjoy so much today.
well, 12 years ago i thought my pentium-133 computer was like blazing fast and couldn't ask for more. 20 years ago i thought my 20 inch cathode rate tube TV was awesome.
so the point i try to make is that. you would never know what it is like till you had a taste of it like smoking, sex. I will be content and happier with a less technological advanced world where the air is cleaner, summer is cooler and lastly bitches know their places.
Are you sure of that? The feminists were just tools - have a look at the comments made on woman's lib midway though this short clip: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1263677258215075609#
Quote from nitro:
One that was catastrophically missed by the great french schools.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Évariste_Galois
His life has movie written all over it. Who would play the young Galois? Who in today's world of young men could pass for a fiery genius of the highest order convincingly?
From the article
"Budding mathematician
In 1828, he attempted the entrance exam to Ãcole Polytechnique, without the usual preparation in mathematics, and failed for lack of explanations on the oral examination. In that same year, he entered the Ãcole préparatoire, a far inferior institution for mathematical studies at that time, where he found some professors sympathetic to him. In the following year, Galois' first paper, on continued fractions[3] was published. Cauchy, a highly eminent mathematician of the time considered Galois' work to be a likely winner.[4] On July 28, 1829, Galois' father committed suicide after a bitter political dispute with the village priest. A couple of days later, Galois took his second, and final attempt at entering the Polytechnique, and failed yet again. It is undisputed that Galois was more than qualified; however, accounts differ on why he failed. The legend holds that he thought the exercise proposed to him by the examiner to be of no interest, and, in exasperation, he threw the rag used to clean up chalk marks on the blackboard at the examiner's head.[5][6] More plausible accounts state that Galois made too many logical leaps and baffled the incompetent examiner, evoking irascible rage in Galois. The recent death of his father may have also influenced his behavior.[2]
Having been denied admission to the Polytechnique, Galois took the Baccalaureate examinations in order to enter the Ecole Normale. He passed, receiving his degree on December 29, 1829. His examiner in mathematics reported: "This pupil is sometimes obscure in expressing his ideas, but he is intelligent and shows a remarkable spirit of research."
So, a school actually PREVENTED a genius from academy and so he was forced to go to an inferior school until he could "dumb down" enough for those examining him to even understand his intelligence. Sounds about right. Academics do not focus on intelligence, only repetition of simplistic ideas. The many innovations made by academics are attributable to the law of large numbers. Eventually, enough intelligent people DO slip into universities and create something intelligent that the general public actually think the universities CAUSED the work to be created.
No wonder dumb females love going so much. First, they excel mindless chores that add no real value. Secondly, they are dumb enough to believe that going to university will trigger some kind of GENIUS BUTTON in their brains.....which never happens because of schooling.
Christ, I'm being called dumb by an idiot.
Double negative?
I admit there is value in poetry to waste time in a great way and a fun hobby when you are bored at the end of the day....but the value of poetry compared to in dime is not nearly as great as the value of time.
I agree with many of your assessments regarding the failure of education. I am guessing that you are at a state school or such. One day in your life, go to a very top university in a field for which it is famous. For example, one day go to a lecture at any of these Universities and listen to a math lecture:
http://grad-schools.usnews.rankings...ate-schools/top-mathematics-programs/rankings
Do the same at a great Liberal Arts University if that is what you enjoy. My point is that most colleges and most undergraduate studies aren't meant to be interesting and encourage creativity, imo. It is meant more to train people to be competent in the work force. This is a terrible travesty, I agree.
But I submit to you that your proposed hypotheses that because women, because they appear to tolerate rote learning makes them dumb, is imo, at best misguided. While there may be a personality or genetic predisposition of women toward being practical, it doesn't mean they don't find it just as mind-numbing boring as you do - they simply are more likely to be bothered less by being bored, or they see it as a means to an end.
If you are straight, you are doing yourself a great deal of damage psychologically to see women in this way. In fact you are damaging yourself even if you are not straight. Not only that, you are confusing personality for intellect, agency, specialization. We are all different even within genders there are differences. Nature has fashioned women the way they are in a nearly perfect way for the evolutionary pressures that a family had to endure for a million years. If in fact they are "dumber" because they are able to contend with rote learning better than men (I doubt this. If there are intellectual differences, they are minute), I have found that one weakness is often compensated by strength somewhere else. Most men find this to celebrate. You somehow are looking at the glass half empty.
Perhaps you should change your hypotheses to something more scientific. So for example, a perfectly reasonable thing to say is, "Are women more psychologically suited to being trained to work in today's work force over men"? Then you would have to do lots of research about men throughout history, and see if they did whatever it took to feed their families etc. Who knows.
http://grad-schools.usnews.rankings...ate-schools/top-mathematics-programs/rankings
Do the same at a great Liberal Arts University if that is what you enjoy. My point is that most colleges and most undergraduate studies aren't meant to be interesting and encourage creativity, imo. It is meant more to train people to be competent in the work force. This is a terrible travesty, I agree.
But I submit to you that your proposed hypotheses that because women, because they appear to tolerate rote learning makes them dumb, is imo, at best misguided. While there may be a personality or genetic predisposition of women toward being practical, it doesn't mean they don't find it just as mind-numbing boring as you do - they simply are more likely to be bothered less by being bored, or they see it as a means to an end.
If you are straight, you are doing yourself a great deal of damage psychologically to see women in this way. In fact you are damaging yourself even if you are not straight. Not only that, you are confusing personality for intellect, agency, specialization. We are all different even within genders there are differences. Nature has fashioned women the way they are in a nearly perfect way for the evolutionary pressures that a family had to endure for a million years. If in fact they are "dumber" because they are able to contend with rote learning better than men (I doubt this. If there are intellectual differences, they are minute), I have found that one weakness is often compensated by strength somewhere else. Most men find this to celebrate. You somehow are looking at the glass half empty.
Perhaps you should change your hypotheses to something more scientific. So for example, a perfectly reasonable thing to say is, "Are women more psychologically suited to being trained to work in today's work force over men"? Then you would have to do lots of research about men throughout history, and see if they did whatever it took to feed their families etc. Who knows.