Actually, your argument is completely backwards (as is anyone making a similar argument). You can't blame fentanyl at all. Its the people - the drug dealers - who are responsible. Just like the bad guys with guns.
What happens when there are too many guns in America
- Thread starter UsualName
- Start date
Actually, your argument is completely backwards (as is anyone making a similar argument). You can't blame fentanyl at all. Its the people - the drug dealers - who are responsible. Just like the bad guys with guns.
Laws covering property damage and bodily harm are civil in nature when done accidentally. So yes, we need a law that ensures that action like driving drunk incurs criminal liability in order to ensure penalties beyond reimbursement are paid despite intentional vs. accidental.
Makes sense. We need a law that ensures that an action like losing your firearm incurs criminal liability in order to ensure penalties beyond reimbursement are paid despite intentional vs. accidental.
(Not an exact argument, only goes to a point, so don't write a wall of words on it, thank you.)
(Not an exact argument, only goes to a point, so don't write a wall of words on it, thank you.)
Last edited:
I don’t know if losing your gun should incur criminal liabilities but sure repeated negligence probably should come with some kind of penalty.
%%
EXACTLY.
SAME way with machine guns + semi autos, which leftest loons + talking snake media mixes up all the time
Drug cartel lost some after getting in a shoot out with US National Guard @ Border........................................Criminal liability for "losing your firearm" might be a bit harsh. But certainly financial responsibility - meaning you can be open to litigation if the firearm is used in a crime. I'd be open to criminal liability if it could be proven that the firearm was not secured in a satisfactory manner. Something akin to firearm "negligence".
%%
Interesting;
most likely a school shooting NEVER happens there.
Except occasional suicide by cop or campus cop\related
