"Also check the constitution, wer'e a rep Republic, not a democracy[mob rule]."
I had to research the difference between republic and democracy (
http://thisnation.com/question/011.html and
http://lexrex.com/enlightened/AmericanIdeal/aspects/demrep.html) however I learned something. Hopefully you don't dispute that the US is a democratic republic (at least on paper. I would have some trouble arguing that the representatives actually always represent the people's wishes and not their own and their friends at times.)
Vietnam and Macedonia are proud to be Socialist Republics. Therefore I think that "republic or not" is not really germane to my original question and intent.
Two points come to mind though - since the original framing of the constitution, things have speeded up greatly. Should the four year turnaround be advanced to something like monthly or even weekly perhaps to keep up with the speed of change? (smile). Also, how does one ensure that the representatives actually follow the majority wishes? I am not clear as to how that was implemented in the original constitution or intents.
"Except capitalism & socialism are not @ all alike-unless someone can not discern between business & gov."
Woodrow Wilson wrote this =>
http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/index.asp?document=2208 He says that they are almost if not quite one and the same and is a difference of organization and policy. (Warning - the essay is tough to read.) An easier read is
http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-the-difference-between-capitalism-and-socialism.htm
I believe that the two organizing principles are very similar but mainly differ in who actually makes the decisions for the country. In one those with the most capital control and run the government (a small group) and in the other a small group of central planners make the decisions. In both, rarely do "the people" actually get some input and change. Neither group is subject to the control of the people (although many fantasies abound on both sides).
Do the corporate leaders care more about their own salaries or adding shareholder value? Does the government bureaucracy care more about giving service or keeping their own jobs? Not much difference here either I suspect.
We will have to agree to disagree on this point I guess.
My question is still, how do we organize resources to distribute to "the people" and ensure a fair and efficient distribution? I think both socialism and capitalism have fatal flaws.