Quote from Lights:
price action is reactive form of trading. the basic physics behind it is that a particular price action tends to lead to another.. certain price action have a >50% expectancy and that is all most traders need to win in the long run.
markets are considered good when there is consistent realization of price pattern, like volume breakout and followthru. markets are considered bad when historically consistent patterns continue to fail in the short term.
but imo, price action is subtier to good fundamental analysis. price is confirmation of a fundamental expectation. when paul tudor jones says in 2002 that the oil industry is going to explode on the upside, that had absolutely nothing to do with price action. in fact, the nation-centric U.S. markets had little idea about globalization and demand until it was PRICED in, recently. very late. (edit) oh also there are many crappy fundamental analysts out there.
Quote from Cluseau:
PTJ told you that his 2002 call on the oil industry had nothing to do with price action? What else did he tell you?
Quote from Lights:
price action is reactive form of trading. the basic physics behind it is that a particular price action tends to lead to another.. certain price action have a >50% expectancy and that is all most traders need to win in the long run.
markets are considered good when there is consistent realization of price pattern, like volume breakout and followthru. markets are considered bad when historically consistent patterns continue to fail in the short term.
but imo, price action is subtier to good fundamental analysis. price is confirmation of a fundamental expectation. when paul tudor jones says in 2002 that the oil industry is going to explode on the upside, that had absolutely nothing to do with price action. in fact, the nation-centric U.S. markets had little idea about globalization and demand until it was PRICED in, recently. very late. (edit) oh also there are many crappy fundamental analysts out there.