We can't have a SCOTUS who is under FBI investigation.

Hmmm. Thats interesting. But aren't the alleged separate crimes actually different? And really, the only one who this could possibly be pertinent to is Manafort right?

I reckon Manafort is the star witness for Mueller. Wouldn't be surprised if NY has charges for Cohen at the ready in case of a pardon.

The charges may be different, but wonder if the circumstances that lead to different charges may not be thrown out as well. For instance, if the FBI was looking into collusion and found state related crimes which were referred to the state AG. If trump pardons the charge that led to the discovery, is the discovery null?
 
5pba97m186p11.jpg

We all know the actual reality...

FRfQbVA.jpg
 
Surely cons will stick to the standard of perjury they used on Clinton?

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/30/us/politics/fbi-kavanaugh-investigation-scope-democrats.html

Yale Classmate Accuses Kavanaugh of ‘Blatant Mischaracterization’ of His Drinking

WASHINGTON — A Yale classmate of Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh’s accused him on Sunday of a “blatant mischaracterization” of his drinking while in college, saying that he often saw Judge Kavanaugh “staggering from alcohol consumption.”

The classmate, Chad Ludington, who said he frequently socialized with Judge Kavanaugh as a student, said in a statement that the judge had been untruthful in testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee when he had denied any possibility that he had ever blacked out from drinking.

Mr. Ludington said that Judge Kavanaugh had played down “the degree and frequency” of his drinking, and that the judge had often become “belligerent and aggressive” while intoxicated.

“It is truth that is at stake, and I believe that the ability to speak the truth, even when it does not reflect well upon oneself, is a paramount quality we seek in our nation’s most powerful judges,” Mr. Ludington said, adding that he planned to “take my information to the F.B.I.”
 
Back
Top