Almost agree. You are improving, keep it up. I would say even it’s not 100% perfect we have no time to wait. Use it or lose it.I'd class that as a win, bringing someone well just 1 around to the sensible maybe it's not all doom and gloom and the plague, 6Bil left to go.
Professor I screen shot, said AntiBody tests not working, only 7% of his staff tested positive and he expected 100%.
Need more time to work out the kinks on mass, by the time it's over, hopefully it'll all be over
We all see how’s Trump is handling covid19. Do you think Biden would do it better?
- Thread starter 1957may10
- Start date
I think rubbish data is possibly worse than no data, we could be talking 20% perfect, which is far from perfect.
A lot of the lockdowns and fear is from bad data from China, look where that got us, world wide depression, over a end of the year 0.1% increase is deaths.
As I know it’s possible
So far as I know this test is not as bad as you stated.
Professor front line in the UK, so all staff I'd assume exposed a lot so expected 100% or very near, only 7% tested positive, or he could of been checking back office staff.
Absolutely right. If you red some of my statements I stated all border should be closed. However, Trump did not do that and European did not as well. Lost two months to prepare.
Closing borders, has a HUGE cost.
Unless you shut down everyone in / out of china for 2 - 5years so there are zero infected and carrying ( for ever if reinfecting possible ), it would always go wild sooner or later.
I do not know about tests UK got. Yes I know if somebody got sick with light symptoms may not have antibodies. Last week Cuomo stated this test 3000 cases shown 13% exposed. As statistic researcher you may add % of were sick but no antibodies and you will have the valid number.
The point we should go over the hill.
Well, if we close we will buy the time, swing it to summer, see how you UK handle it.
But government at local, state, fed always find the worse solution.