You don't have to do much digging to discover 911 was a poorly run inside job, but you do need to dig rather than believe the impossible.
Bush said he saw the 1st plane strike on TV, but it was not on TV. If it was a slip of the tongue and he meant the 2nd strike, what idiot would say, "I thought to myself, that is a terrible pilot!"
My dog could figure out 2 planes crashing into the Twin Towers in close succession was not double pilot error.
The buildings collapsed because of structural failure caused by fire. Yes, that's the fire that went out so people could be seen standing in the cool gaping holes in the external structure begging for help. That's the fire that burned 1000 degrees below the temperature that damages steel. That's the fire that was mostly a flash burn outside the buildings. That the fire that collapsed a building with an indestructible core. The magic fire that was the first in world history to destroy a tall building.
There are so many daft errors that you need to be brainwashed to believe 911 was not an inside job.
But as for Ron, I've come to the conclusion he's right because he's one of the "them". He gives the same "club" signals and his inside information is perfect. I think they use him to gauge how brainwashed the public are... most don't believe and don't care anyways. There's a dark, warm. soft place for their heads to rest.
When US historian Howard Zinn says, "I don't care if 911 was an inside job", even though the ramifications are trillions of $ of war debt and a milion dead to say nothing of the impact inside the US, when you don't care about truth you care about nothing.
If the elite want to know how much they can get away with, the reaction to Ron is an excelent guide. There's no stopping them now
