War!

Here4money said:
I'm sure the most transparent administration in history will present clear evidence and elucidate Soleimani's actionable plans that made him a palpable & imminent danger to Americans in the region.
More...

No doubt you and your ilk will be proposing reparations payments to Iran for our misdeeds. How bout another 150 billion. Howz that sound to you? They used the last 150 billion to finance even more terrorism. Maybe Ilhan Oman will set up a go fund me page to collect money to carry out the mission that poor Mr. Soleimeni wanted to complete. There's a chance right there for you to contribute.

As far as watching General Soleimi, we did that for decades, and it was not pretty. The lefty dems all love the diplomats because they know that they are all lefties. If Trump did not take action to stop plans in motion to attack diplomats, they would be the very first to argue that Trump hates them so he did not do what was needed to protect them and that he was just focused on impeachment and getting re-elected. You know the script you are supposed to follow regardless of what he does.
 
Last edited:
Here4money said:
I'm sure the most transparent administration in history will present clear evidence and elucidate Soleimani's actionable plans that made him a palpable & imminent danger to Americans in the region.
More...
Was Bin Laden a "palpable and imminent threat" when he was assassinated, or was he killed because of what he had done and might do? He was just some old man in hiding when we turned off his lights. Facts are that Soleimani had more blood on his hands, had terrorized more people over a longer period of time and had more resources than Bin Laden ever had. Terrorist gets taken out under Obama administration it's all good, very good. Worse terrorist gets taken out under Trump administration, bad, very bad. You guys are nothing if not predictable.
 
CaptainObvious said:
Was Bin Laden a "palpable and imminent threat" when he was assassinated, or was he killed because of what he had done and might do? He was just some old man in hiding when we turned off his lights. Facts are that Soleimani had more blood on his hands, had terrorized more people over a longer period of time and had more resources than Bin Laden ever had. Terrorist gets taken out under Obama administration it's all good, very good. Worse terrorist gets taken out under Trump administration, bad, very bad. You guys are nothing if not predictable.
More...

No need to try to steer the conversation. The pentagon's excuse for this act of war was a clear and imminent danger to our troops in the region, not past transgressions to them in armed conflict. As to the rest:

Here4money said:
Designating a nation's defense force a terrorist organization does not magically make them terrorists or change the definitions of words. They're as much terrorists as our black ops, who also fund proxy entities.
More...
 
Here4money said:
No need to try to steer the conversation. The pentagon's excuse for this act of war was a clear and imminent danger to our troops in the region, not past transgressions to them in armed conflict. As to the rest:
More...

After all the 'Hillary will start a war' and 'America first, no troops in ME' these right wingers have gone back to the Bush talking point when they cheerled the Iraq war. These cultists don't mind another war as long as the anti-immigrant rhetoric keeps coming from Dotard's mouth.
 
exGOPer said:
After all the 'Hillary will start a war' and 'America first, no troops in ME' these right wingers have gone back to the Bush talking point when they cheerled the Iraq war. These cultists don't mind another war as long as the anti-immigrant rhetoric keeps coming from Dotard's mouth.
More...

nobody truly believes Trump or his followers were ever anti-war. The only universal truth is they're pro-white.

Spike Trader said:
Will Mr ''I know more than the Generals'' bring back the billions of dollars military hardware , or will he leave it to ISIS?


More...

Surely we'll respect Iraq's sovereignty and by no means try to influence the result of said resolution, or god forbid ignore it? After all, Trump promised to pull out of Iraq.
 
Here4money said:
nobody truly believes Trump or his followers were ever anti-war. The only universal truth is they're pro-white.



Surely we'll respect Iraq's sovereignty and by no means try to influence the result of said resolution, or god forbid ignore it? After all, Trump promised to pull out of Iraq.
More...

Good riddance to them.

The Kurds will want to split off from Iraq. And Trump - despite his recent mis-step with them- will be willing to help them to form Trumpistan....er, I mean Kurdistan. Let's not forget who has the oil in Iraq.
 
Here4money said:
No need to try to steer the conversation. The pentagon's excuse for this act of war was a clear and imminent danger to our troops in the region, not past transgressions to them in armed conflict. As to the rest:
More...
The King of Trolls wins again
Magic.jpg
 
Here4money said:
that's a tired ol' meme, and to quote Trump, "very low iq". C'mon now, can't defend you argument with a shred of genuine intellect? And you're damn right I'll defend the innocent collateral of an eventual carpet bomb campaign.
More...
What argument, that killing a terrorist is a good thing? What sane person cannot see the good in that? What's your argument against doing it, that it makes them mad at us? They'll escalate their acts of terrorism as if that wouldn't happen anyway? If they choose to escalate we should completely destroy the entire nation of Iran using whatever means necessary to accomplish that. I have stated in the past that the only way peace comes to that part of the world is when the entire region is reduced into a nuclear ash pile. I see nothing occurring now or anytime in the foreseeable future that would change my mind. Might as well be 2020. Nice even, easy to remember year.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top