Want to see what an idiot looks like

You better go read the article. The five sailors had symptoms the first time, followed by two negative tests and they had symptoms the second time. This was not about lingering RNA particles that caused a positive test after recovery.

There are a lot of defective test kits so, what does that prove? Just because there is an article written doesn't mean squat in terms of being truthful. Lots of lies and disinformation coming from the extreme liberals. Propaganda is what it is but, keep trying. Posting articles proves nothing. Garbage in, garbage out. And who audited the figures on number of deaths, infections and tests on the Corona Virus? If the answer is nobody, then, your figures are garbage. Financial statements of companies are audited to ascertain their accuracy and make sure everyone is honest when reporting their financial information. The same applies here.
 
Last edited:
There are a lot of defective test kits so, what does that prove? Just because there is an article written doesn't mean squat in terms of being truthful. Lots of lies and disinformation coming from the extreme liberals. Propaganda is what it is but, keep trying. Posting articles proves nothing. Garbage in, garbage out. And who audited the figures on number of deaths, infections and tests on the Corona Virus? If the answer is nobody, then, your figures are garbage. Financial statements of companies are audited to ascertain their accuracy and make sure everyone is honest when reporting their financial information. The same applies here.

So you believe that AP is a dishonest new source when they are sourcing article from Pentagon spokesman Jonathan Hoffman and named Navy resources. You are stating the information the U.S. Navy is providing is all lies. Just mere garbage.

I will have to disagree with you.
 
the only politicization happening is from the WH. Pointing out the abysmal response to COVID by said WH is not politicizing the issue.

As usual, no one is praying harder for dead Americans than you are.

You better be careful, there are still several months until the election and there could be some good news about the virus along the way, which would throw you into a deep depression and leave you with no campaign strategy at all. Just as all your other scams fell apart.

You don't have a candidate, but by gawd, you got a virus to work with and that virus gonna have to perform for you.
 
Last edited:
Let me break it down for you lost souls. Covid has been politically driven from the jump. It has went through a couple variations, but Trump and election 2020 always the target. Lets go back to January. Was Covid a threat to our very existence then? No it was not, every Democrat said so. Don't bother denying it, we have them all on tape saying no biggie, not really a problem. The politics at that time were Trump is a racist for shutting down travel from China. Ho hum, business as usual, not much milage out of that. First week of March comes. What happened first week of March? We start seeing a few cases pop up here. What else happened first week of March? Think fellas, you can do it. Super Tuesday happened. What happened on Super Tuesday? Joe wins big. After some short lived elation everyone woke up to what I like to call Holy Fuck Wednesday. OMFG, Biden is our candidate. Reality comes crashing in and a pivot happens, a big pivot, an all in pivot. Suddenly Covid is going to kill us all. Now they knew from the moment they spewed that bullshit it wasn't true, but they knew if they could instill enough panic and fear they could convince everyone we need to lock it all down and what would happen as a result of that. Viola, they take away the one big card Trump has, a great economy happening during his reign. All the chips are on this one play now. The longer they keep it going, the better chance they have. The real beauty of this is they convinced Trump to play along. Fucking genius I must say.

exponentially infectious diseases, how do they work? Anyone who thought this wasn't a problem once it was on our shores is off their rocker
 
Let me break it down for you lost souls. Covid has been politically driven from the jump. It has went through a couple variations, but Trump and election 2020 always the target. Lets go back to January. Was Covid a threat to our very existence then? No it was not, every Democrat said so. Don't bother denying it, we have them all on tape saying no biggie, not really a problem. The politics at that time were Trump is a racist for shutting down travel from China. Ho hum, business as usual, not much milage out of that. First week of March comes..


Why did you skip the entirety of February? Doesn't suit the narrative?

Also Trump didn't shut down anything from China, 40000+ people still got in from China, he was bullshitting as usual to comfort your racist soul and it worked.
 
Why did you skip the entirety of February? Doesn't suit the narrative?

Also Trump didn't shut down anything from China, 40000+ people still got in from China, he was bullshitting as usual to comfort your racist soul and it worked.

The real problem with the 40,000 people that came from China after the "shut-down" is that most went through no health screening with temperature and questions. None were quarantined. There was no requirement or recommendation that the quarantined for 14 days upon arrival.

Note that if you came from a hotspot where Ebola existed they made people quarantine for several weeks upon arrival in the U.S.
 
So you believe that AP is a dishonest new source when they are sourcing article from Pentagon spokesman Jonathan Hoffman and named Navy resources. You are stating the information the U.S. Navy is providing is all lies. Just mere garbage.

I will have to disagree with you.

While, we have a lot of American patriots in the US military, we still have political hacks everywhere. Unless, figures are audited, any political hack can manufacture any results they want. And you have no problems with having 2 negative tests then, a positive test? That tells you outright that probably, the test kits are defective? Now, you have to run each person tested thru multiple test kits employing different methods. What if you get a positive and negatives then? That is why the results are garbage.
 
While, we have a lot of American patriots in the US military, we still have political hacks everywhere. Unless, figures are audited, any political hack can manufacture any results they want. And you have no problems with having 2 negative tests then, a positive test? That tells you outright that probably, the test kits are defective? Now, you have to run each person tested thru multiple test kits employing different methods. What if you get a positive and negatives then? That is why the results are garbage.

The issue as outlined by the military is not the two negative tests followed by the positive tests. The problem is that they developed symptoms for the second time.

In other words - they got re-infected after recovering from COVID-19 the first time.
 
The issue as outlined by the military is not the two negative tests followed by the positive tests. The problem is that they developed symptoms for the second time.

In other words - they got re-infected after recovering from COVID-19 the first time.

So, did they get tested or not because of the symptoms? Just having symptoms is not enough as a lot of the symptoms are the same for coughs and colds or even the flu. If they relied on the symptoms alone, you have to question their objectivity at a minimum. And if you say, they tested positive then, the accuracy of the test kits are in doubt and they have to be re-tested multiple times now, using different test kits. Did they re-test those individuals multiple times now, using different types of test kits? Again, if you answer no then, you have to question the motivation why you would not try to validate questionable results? It smacks of trying to drive a political agenda.
 
So, did they get tested or not because of the symptoms? Just having symptoms is not enough as a lot of the symptoms are the same for coughs and colds or even the flu. If they relied on the symptoms alone, you have to question their objectivity at a minimum. And if you say, they tested positive then, the accuracy of the test kits are in doubt and they have to be re-tested multiple times now, using different test kits. Did they re-test those individuals multiple times now? Again, if you answer know then, you have to question the motivation why you would not try to validation questionable results?

As the article stated --- they felt sick a few days after re-joining the ship, reported to the medical facility to be evaluated, got tested positive, and were removed from the ship to be quarantined on shore.
 
Back
Top