Quote from jack hershey:
[B
Incorrect assumption/ faulty beliefs and non deductive thinking:
1."you are so mixed up at this point that you want me to respond to all your mistaken beliefs.The mind cannot erase. Faulty beliefs"
2 Your point of no return is rapidly approaching.
3."Don't think about it. Find out the hard way like all those who came before you who ae following your path"
"new inference will fall in place in front of the mistaken beliefs you now blab all the time."
I know, 25 % of the missing information.
. [/B]
Jack,
Your Checks, if accurate for all types. Should put me in an undefinable area. I imagine this is the case as time is not an ....(Something).. to analyse the market. (which is what I do).
I do not follow your rules. I understand that to deduce would be to follow the given laws. I follow a few and then try to fill in blanks. BUT If I can follow a few, I can deduce. I just don't . What is the probability I can deduce better then most when need be ? Do we use probability? Can we put an X in this column ?
I am lazy and cant write on a paper with a crayon of the opposite colour like a 5 year old or grade 5er can. So I am stupid or lazy or not serious or uncommited. OR I am unfocused. Does Excel deduce this ? It should.
People can be unfocused for many reasons. If your excel sheet uses CW as a way of classifying me, then the probability I can do this is the same as the probability that you hold a lottery ticket for me. That is why we are deducing
It is only a matter of time till I have a bad morning night or day (as /I seem to be here reading your other posts most the time) and say something that will tell give you needed information to make a conclusion. I probably can crack the given puzzle in an hour or two if I had a pen and paper. Even if it meant that 25% of the information is missing.
I did not know what orthogonal was before hand
I did not respit the idea of # of trades vs number of transaction. It was brought in by CW
If I am being judged in my current situation (one of which I do not pick up a crayon) then please stop. Its not fare. If you must, you can stop replying until I state I am ready. I did not expect you would respond to the last post (in this thread) as I, in your eyes, "forfieted" (hence the worse then usual use of the English language)
It is just a puzzle within a puzzle within a puzzle and clearly the obstacle is just a pen. Information in the right order yields to yes no answers and the answer isn't even a answer, it is just putting a picture to yes no statements that can allow us to see some overlaps that we may use to make new laws.
Continuous Curiosity is a good trait, it is the fuel to answer/solve (any method). It is not a replacement for a goal as it has to be continuous.
Generally, to assume one will go from A to Z based on curiosity alone is a bit unrealistic. A bit of pre CW(probability) thinking would be needed for a mind to be in that state.
A friend solved the rubuicks cube. Time was spent before the ideas of algos was given, curiosity drove him to that point. The thought of his friends watching him do it under 2 mins was the goal/pay off that took over when curiosity died. He did what no one around him did, he was seen as smart. We know there's nothing smart about it. Its just following and remembering, Maybe new algos can be made. It is in fact following, The magic was the idea to use algos.
Our friend lost interest cause in his hart he knew he was just spiting out formulas. Goal was met. Curiosity was not quenched. Now he may hold the record for least number of moves needed to solve the cube.
So again, Id like to bounce ideas around, especially yours , but if it is to be judged I'd rather not play like this. (and your work does involve creativity)
Week 2 is done, one thing was asked, no progress was made. No attempt to get the loot, just ramblings and problem solving in traditional ways. My brain is here to solve problems. I do not want answers, I want problems I do not have a goal or expectations of hope. This is my therapy it is probably consistent with last years posts; spurts of ideas with no goals followed by months of silence.
Usually spurts are short lived and this one you should be proud of.
One can time my race against others but I just may be more interested in the track (for future reference) then racing. Can it be deduced that I am not going to win when I do run?
I trust your excel sheet checks for annomolys. And does not have all possible combinations of possible answers defined. (adding a screen for coherency should also be added)
Treat a prisoner bad, offer him a 5 course meal out of the blue, hunger and curiosity of taste will poison the ones you seek, but the smart one will have decided on what he eats. both die one hungry, one full. Even Amway gives more then one path of duplication you can sell or you can build.
The assumed benefit of this is NOT going to come in time for me, not this round ( It is not deduced. It is a forced reality I decided via CW as I have responsibilities much bigger then anything here including myself).
I hope you appreciate any focus given here, it should be seen as your work is interesting to me ( i hope that counts for something). It really is amazing how far you led me even after the acceptance that even if there is hope it will not be in time.
I seen you post in a quantum thread. You also refer to formulas that are cutting edge and do not seem to be used for trading but other physical random movement.
You must then know the facts:
All probability can be seen
The path of the outcome is chosen by a "observer"
Knowing what will happen makes for good trading.
I hope you crack that or at least share a vision like mine.
Its always nice to read your posts. But I do not want you to regret your time with me or deduce me. Do as you must if you must but do so in style, not CW style. expect more deducing related thoughts if the last one was closer to that. But focus is not to solve untill I have decided to pick up a pencil and write down your laws.
