Viewing FBI/Justice Department corruption from another angle...

T

TreeFrogTrader

Note that this investigation began under O'Dufus.

A lot of the corruption in the fbi is framed as a left versus right battle within the intelligence agencies. That is most of it but it is more than that.

We know that the dcn swamp coordinated and colluded to bring Bernie down. And here we see the coordination between the dnc/clintonista/intelligence agency swampistas trying to bring Bernie down to keep him out of the way for the next election and to delegitimize him with the people.

Yes, there is probably/possibly a crime there but it is more than clear that the reason the justice department leans into pursuing something is not whether there is or is not the probability of a crime.


You tards think the dnc and the intelligence agencies are on your side? Think again if you are a "progressive" ofthe Bernie wing. They are working full time to make sure your ilk goes nowhere.


https://www.cnbc.com/2017/12/09/fbi...-is-running-on-politics-alone-commentary.html
 
The DNC and the Clinton Campaign paid for Crowdstrike and Trump dossier and then they turned it over to the Clinton campaigners in the DOJ and the FBI.

It's all one big incestuous, evil club.
 
Republicans claim to be pro law enforcement but thats only when its law enforcement vs blacks.When law enforcement comes for Trump republicans say law enforcement is corrupt.
 
Tony Stark said:
Republicans claim to be pro law enforcement but thats only when its law enforcement vs blacks.When law enforcement comes for Trump republicans say law enforcement is corrupt.
More...

So you are okay with the Obama justice department witchhunting Bernie?
 
TreeFrogTrader said:
So you are okay with the Obama justice department witchhunting Bernie?
More...


I haven't read about it since it was first announced months ago but IIRC the allegations against his wife seemed credible and I did not have problem with The DOJ looking into it.
 
fbi-dems.jpg
 
TreeFrogTrader said:
Note that this investigation began under O'Dufus.

A lot of the corruption in the fbi is framed as a left versus right battle within the intelligence agencies. That is most of it but it is more than that.

We know that the dcn swamp coordinated and colluded to bring Bernie down. And here we see the coordination between the dnc/clintonista/intelligence agency swampistas trying to bring Bernie down to keep him out of the way for the next election and to delegitimize him with the people.

Yes, there is probably/possibly a crime there but it is more than clear that the reason the justice department leans into pursuing something is not whether there is or is not the probability of a crime.


You tards think the dnc and the intelligence agencies are on your side? Think again if you are a "progressive" ofthe Bernie wing. They are working full time to make sure your ilk goes nowhere.


https://www.cnbc.com/2017/12/09/fbi...-is-running-on-politics-alone-commentary.html
More...

I love how you guys say Hillary Clinton colluded to bring down Bernie? How, by paying for the caucuses and debates?
 
UsualName said:
I love how you guys say Hillary Clinton colluded to bring down Bernie? How, by paying for the caucuses and debates?
More...
My understanding is that it was thru her indirect control of DNC money, apparently she was personally responsible for raising much of it. And Wasserman-Schultz seemed to make decisions as though she was personally working directly for Ms Clinton, even though she wasn't officially. And a major factor was Hillary tying up all the super delegates very early. I think the Super delegate thing is a DNC thing. What I mean is i think the DNC decides the Super Delgate policy and how it will work. If you are in on the ground floor of party politics than you could influence the process to help yourself or your candidate. I am not a member of any political party myself. The one person who could tell us exactly what transpired and how hillary so successfully tied up the nomination would be Sanders, and he doesn't seem to want to talk about it that much now that the election is over. Bernie was an outsider, so he might have been a little naive to think that popularity among voters was the most important criterion. On the other hand maybe he was intentionally misled by the DNC Brass into thinking he had a chance as that would make Hillary's nomination look legit. . .

In the end I think the DNC just very badly miscalculated. They probably thought Trump had no chance, so any Democrat could beat him, and it was Hillarys turn after Barrack had taken the nomination from her. .

The truth is you have to play party politics for years to expect to get the nomination. Both parties have nominated candidates that had little chance of being elected because they had paid their dues working for the party and it was their turn. My impression is this happens mostly when it is a foregone conclusion that the election is lost anyway. An example would be Bob Dole, or John McCain. What's amazing is Trump getting the nomination! I think the RNC must have just lost control. How did he pull that off?

I tend to lose sight of the fact that we are not much of a democracy at the Federal level anymore. We would be a very democratic Republic if only the House was not so heavily Gerrymandered. But it is. That's reality. The Senate is the one body that remains democratic. And that's somewhat ironic, since the Senate was originally appointed.
 
Last edited:
piezoe said:
My understanding is that it was thru her indirect control of DNC money, apparently she was personally responsible for raising much of it. And Wasserman-Schultz seemed to make decisions as though she was personally working directly for Ms Clinton, even though she wasn't officially. And a major factor was Hillary tying up all the super delegates very early. I think the Super delegate thing is a DNC thing. What I mean is i think the DNC decides the Super Delgate policy and how it will work. If you are in on the ground floor of party politics than you could influence the process to help yourself or your candidate. I am not a member of any political party myself. The one person who could tell us exactly what transpired and how hillary so successfully tied up the nomination would be Sanders, and he doesn't seem to want to talk about it that much now that the election is over. Bernie was an outsider, so he might have been a little naive to think that popularity among voters was the most important criterion. On the other hand maybe he was intentionally misled by the DNC Brass into thinking he had a chance as that would make Hillary's nomination look legit. . .

In the end I think the DNC just very badly miscalculated. They probably thought Trump had no chance, so any Democrat could beat him, and it was Hillarys turn after Barrack had taken the nomination from her. .

The truth is you have to play party politics for years to expect to get the nomination. Both parties have nominated candidates that had little chance of being elected because they had paid their dues working for the party and it was their turn. My impression is this happens mostly when it is a foregone conclusion that the election is lost anyway. An example would be Bob Dole, or John McCain.

I tend to lose sight of the fact that we are not much of a democracy at the Federal level anymore. We would be a very democratic Republic if only the House was not so heavily Gerrymandered. But it is. That's reality. The Senate is the one body that remains democratic. And that's somewhat ironic, since the Senate was originally appointed.
More...

Here’s what people don’t talk about interns of Hillary funding the dnc and why it is easy to say her campaign conspired with the dnc: she had to fund it because sanders wanted a free ride. If he would’ve pulled his weight nobody would have anything to say.

Sanders paid nothing for those caucuses and debates. He got a total free ride. Clinton funded large aspects of her opponents campaign. He got voter list and donor lists and the dnc defending his positions against republicans all courtesy of Hillary Clinton.

The whole time he was in front of the cameras complaining about the dnc he was behind the scenes saying give me more free stuff.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top