Hi, my name is Ernie, I'll be your server tonight. I just took a dump and didn't wash my hands, can I get beverages?
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-31127704
ROTFLMAO
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-31127704
ROTFLMAO
Did you guys read the article?
He's making an argument for less regulation, arguing that restaurants that did not require employees to wash hands would quickly go out of business (because any customer in their right mind would not go there), thereby letting capitalism work without government interference. He wasn't arguing that employees shouldn't have to wash their hands. It was an example of over regulation, even if a poor one.
Sheesh.
Hi, my name is Ernie, I'll be your server tonight. I just took a dump and didn't wash my hands, can I get beverages?
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-31127704
ROTFLMAO
I guess it's a matter of degree, and tillis went too far. But i'll give another example.
Mcdonalds. At the local mcd near where I live, the cashier who handles the money and gives you your change also goes and gets the coffee you ordered. They fill up the coffee cup and then use their bare hands to put the lid on the cup, using their fingers to go around the top of the lid to clamp it down on the cup. This is with their bare hands and right after they've handled the money in the register and given you change.
I wouldn't want to try to get a law passed so they couldn't do this. I just will never buy their coffee. I think this is the idea tillis is talking about and he went overboard and used a bad example.
At some point government regulation must end and societal norms take over. I'm ok with the legal requirement to provide washing facilities, but balk at laws requiring the actual washing. How is that supposed to be enforced?