Pretty unclear what your point in general here is, let alone what it has to do with what I said? You don't think anyone has left Twitter in the last 4 years in disgust over the fact they let Trump flaunt their TOS while spewing vitriol? I certainly did. You don't have to follow Trump's Twitter feed to be aware of what it contains.Twitter is largely an echo chamber. The people who hate Trump don't follow him. They mostly only follow other people who think like they do.
The mistake you make is deciding that conservatives and the Trump cultists the same group. There are tens of millions of conservatives who dislike Trump and absolutely hate the crap he spews on Twitter. They like his conservative policies and don't like the opposition to the extent they still vote for him, but it's a pretty massive and in my view incorrect assumption that they also like his Twitter feed, or really like him opening his mouth much at all. They're not mad Twitter banned him, they're either neutral or downright glad. And then there is the fact that a huge chunk of the demographic that supports Trump is old enough that they will never use Twitter.Social media platforms want more users, more viewers, not less. Conservatives are a sizable chunk of the economy. I suspect most advertisers want their business. Shareholders want to see higher revenue, not lower.
So you're left with a chunk of a few million hard core Trump supporters who think storming the capitol and people dying for a lie about massive voter fraud is OK and are also Twitter users. Twitter made a simple business decision that they had very little to gain by coddling this group because there are few advertisers who want to sell to them, and far more to lose from a much bigger and more lucrative chunk of their user base who would be furious if they were coddled. It was an imminently reasonable least bad choice given the options available to them.
