Twitter and Musk

El OchoCinco said:
You dont need a ToS to ban child pornography for it to be not allowed on a site is my point. Just because ToS does not address child pornography does not make it suddenly wrong, a site does that to cover their ass so they cannot be sued or arrested.

Musk can change ToS because offensive posts is a subjective definition. He can decide what is offensive to twitter that is not already illegal.
More...
isn't the bolded just semantics for the purpose of this conversation though (I still don't get the legal intricacies that perhaps you're getting at but irrelevant for the sake the point being made perhaps)?
 
nrstrader said:
It is just so disturbing to see these Jacobin assholes cry and bitch over someone wanting to create a platform for legit dialog.

There is a large segment of people who have lost the entire idea that implicit in the concept of open dialog is the reality you might be utterly wrong in what you think. The epistemological certainty many people have today is devastating to our society because they only real thing we have going for us is being open minded enough to stumble on unique solutions to problems.

You can't be open minded in thought and closed minded in language. That is the height of stupid and clueless.
More...
or.... Musk is lying and we're calling him out
 
VicBee said:
No, my thought was with regards to businesses refusing to serve people of color or sexual preference and such.
More...
oh, in that case, no I don't think discriminating against users in a private platform is against the law. Storm front (nazi forum which would ban blacks in a heart beat) did not get booted by their hosts for being discriminatory, it got booted under public pressure of domain hosts.
 
Cuddles said:
isn't the bolded just semantics for the purpose of this conversation though (I still don't get the legal intricacies that perhaps you're getting at but irrelevant for the sake the point being made perhaps)?
More...


I am just saying Musk can change twitter signifiantly and decide to ban the entire left side of the spectrum if he wanted to....he can rewrite tos or make them vague enough to give his moderators lots of leeway to feed into any crazy idea he comes up with.
 
El OchoCinco said:
I am just saying Musk can change twitter signifiantly and decide to ban the entire left side of the spectrum if he wanted to....he can rewrite tos or make them vague enough to give his moderators lots of leeway to feed into any crazy idea he comes up with.
More...
Got it, and yes, I agree and hinted at it (I think you kind of came into the defense of it when Bee responded to my statement).

I even claimed the value to Musk is in controlling the conversation for political and eventual monetary goals through legislation, not through monetizing the platform directly. (a tad tinfoil I'll admit). Though why would Rupert Murdoch, Bezos, and on and on own media companies otherwise?
 
Cuddles said:
Got it, and yes, I agree and hinted at it (I think you kind of came into the defense of it when Bee responded to my statement).

I even claimed the value to Musk is in controlling the conversation for political and eventual monetary goals through legislation, not through monetizing the platform directly. (a tad tinfoil I'll admit).
More...


Sorry for the confusion, seems we are saying hte smae thing but I got confused/hung up on one comment from Vic so lets say it is all Vic fucking fault
 
El OchoCinco said:
I am just saying Musk can change twitter signifiantly and decide to ban the entire left side of the spectrum if he wanted to....he can rewrite tos or make them vague enough to give his moderators lots of leeway to feed into any crazy idea he comes up with.
More...

Musk-richer-version-of-my-pillow-guy.jpg
 
As I said musk can do what he wants with twitter, I think it is a shit show, just ask Kyrie and Kanye... but Tesla stock could be below $100 in 2 years if its CEO cares more about this shit then facing an increasing competitive market for EVs
 
El OchoCinco said:
As I said musk can do what he wants with twitter, I think it is a shit show,
More...

At least this is an idea that has been proven to be a money-maker. Just check out how OnlyFans is doing.
But does Musk really want Twitter to be a porn platform?

Twitter Exploring 'Paywalled Video' Which Would Obviously Be Flooded With Porn
Elon Musk has been desperately looking for ways to make Twitter profitable after paying $44 billion for the site.
https://gizmodo.com/twitter-paywalled-video-porn-elon-musk-onlyfans-verify-1849731076
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top