Protest, yes. But these aren’t protests, they’re riots. Big difference.
You are calling 98 percent peaceful protest with some riotous behavior riots.
Protest, yes. But these aren’t protests, they’re riots. Big difference.
I don't disagree with any of this, but I could easily say "when the country is told to lock down and stay indoors and away from mass gatherings, but then the country sees hundreds of thousands of people marching and rioting and performing mass gatherings, the people who are locking down go 'hey, why don't the rules apply over there?'"
The rules apply everywhere. What are you suggesting?
Are you saying that all the whining about masks the whole world is wearing, and the dismissive attitudes towards secret police arresting peaceful protesters is because you're mad that people weren't social distancing during the protests? Or are you merely just deploying the whataboutism pseudo defense?
Can there ever be an issue that doesn't immediately invoke the whataboutism "defense?" (It's not a real defense, btw.)
No, that would be the officers of the court attempting to halt the unconstitutional overreach had you bothered to watch the videos.That would be the ones who pull down statues, or the ones who loot and destroy public/private businesses and property?
Whataboutism is completely a valid defense. The only people who say otherwise are people trying to protect one class of citizen or side of the argument from another. The only thing Whataboutism doesn't do is absolve you of guilt if you are doing something wrong.
If you tell me I have to stay inside and lock down to prevent the spread of a virus, and then you attack me every time I go outside or don't wear a mask, but you openly allow and in some cases encourage it when it is protesting and rioting, I don't get to say "hey, what about them?"
I don't disagree with any of this, but I could easily say "when the country is told to lock down and stay indoors and away from mass gatherings, but then the country sees hundreds of thousands of people marching and rioting and performing mass gatherings, the people who are locking down go 'hey, why don't the rules apply over there?'"

I've already stated that the rules applied to everyone; so it's not a valid defense in this case.
They broke the rules. But that doesn't mean that my response should be to also break the rules.
If we were in elementary school, and Tommy and Johnny were allowed to have recess, and you were denied; then yeah ... go for it! Get your recess by any means necessary. Break some rules!
But these rule are about the health and safety of health workers, elderly, young, others and most importantly, not clogging up hospitals--not recess; not D's vs R's.
Only in this country, at this time, with this generation, can the whole world wear masks; and at the same time, Half of America thinks it's about a Trump thing.
Yeah, kinda like the trump rally’s where no mask or social distancing was enforced. That really pissed us off.![]()
The difference here is only one is being criticized openly for it.