Trump’s approval rating hits new low

so all that time for months if not a year or two you were telling us your polls were good because they picked the winner in 2012... you were just bullshitting over and over?

for instance..

"Thats right jem,the polls you consider garbage picks the eventual winner in the majority of their polls"

Yeah,the two RCP polls that had Trump in the lead the most,although he lost by millions of votes,are the good ones
 
Give it up with the "Hillary got more votes Narrative"

23wlvr1rorzx.png


The American people don't like Trump.Millions more people voted for Hillary and out of more than 80 approval ratings polls since he has been President only Rasmussen has had him reaching a 50 % approval rating.
 
so all that time for months if not a year or two you were telling us your polls were good because they picked the winner in 2012... you were just bullshitting over and over?

for instance..

"Thats right jem,the polls you consider garbage picks the eventual winner in the majority of their polls"

I don't remember those specific conversations or there context but I agree the polls pick the winner the majority of the time.

If the 90 % odds of the popular vote winner winning the election had happened in 2016 the polls would have been right in picking the winner in 2016.
 
watching you bullshit on this subject is fun.
the polls did not pick the winner and they had hillary up by huge margins.
you are just about the only person in the country saying the polls were good.
you are entertaining.


by the way... hillary probably got millions of illegal votes

http://www.dailywire.com/news/12760...s-study-claims-millions-john-nolte#exit-modal
...
Notice, though, how across all of these media outlets, everyone is on the exact same page in their panicked rush to shut down debate by declaring Trump a liar, and a liar with "zero evidence."

It all seems kinda coordinated, no?

And then Phase II inevitably begins, the release of the BigThink pieces that utilize words like "dangerous." You see, if you question the science PEOPLE COULD BE HURT, so you better shut your fat mouth.


SPONSORED CONTENT
[paste:font size="5"]a little over two years ago:

In a forthcoming article in the journal Electoral Studies, we bring real data from big social science survey datasets to bear on the question of whether, to what extent, and for whom non-citizens vote in U.S. elections. Most non-citizens do not register, let alone vote. But enough do that their participation can change the outcome of close races. …

How many non-citizens participate in U.S. elections? More than 14 percent of non-citizens in both the 2008 and 2010 samples indicated that they were registered to vote. Furthermore, some of these non-citizens voted. Our best guess, based upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 percent of non-citizens voted in 2010.

Because non-citizens tended to favor Democrats (Obama won more than 80 percent of the votes of non-citizens in the 2008 CCES sample), we find that this participation was large enough to plausibly account for Democratic victories in a few close elections.

It is a fascinating study based on something called "self-reporting," which means that non-citizens admitted to voting illegally. And the study was conducted by…

Jesse Richman is Associate Professor of Political Science and International Studies at Old Dominion University, and Director of the ODU Social Science Research Center. David Earnest is Associate Professor of Political Science and International Studies at Old Dominion University, and Associate Dean for Research & Graduate Studies in the College of Arts and Letters.

Using the widely disputed Left/MSM number of 11 million illegals, this particular study claims that millions of illegal votes could have been cast during the 2008 presidential election. When you consider the focus on Hispanic turnout during the 2016 election, combined with all the talk about border walls and racism, and no less than President Obama reassuring illegals they could flood the polls without fearing any consequence… Well, you fill in the blank.

Now, is this particular study disputed?

Yes. Very much so.

And that's fine. In fact, that's healthy. Disputes are good. I'm an American, which means I like disputes and debate and alternate points of view.

My problem is that Phil Rucker and Jake Tapper and PolitiFact, and all of the rest of the national media, are trying to snuff out debate by LYING.

Outright, flat-out LYING.
 
ha,ha, This is how his threads always go. He starts out with some left wing headline and expects it to sway us all now that we see that experts are disagreeing with us, and then as someone doesn't bite it hook line and sinker like a democrat would, he gets all tangled up into some detail which the astute poster so kindly pointed out. Same with the other guy and his weather.
 
The American people don't like Trump.Millions more people voted for Hillary and out of more than 80 approval ratings polls since he has been President only Rasmussen has had him reaching a 50 % approval rating.

Again...all those "millions of more votes" came from a 75 mile radius in Southern California. Tell me...where do most illegal aliens live? Oh that's right...in the same area.
 
http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-approval-rating-gallup-2017-3

It took Trump just 69 days to accomplish something that the country's most unpopular presidents took years to achieve


President Donald Trump needed just 69 days to plunge to a mark that past presidents such as Jimmy Carter, Richard Nixon, and George W. Bush took years to reach: an approval rating of 35% or lower in Gallup's survey.

Trump hit 35% in the Gallup daily tracker on Wednesday. Seven other presidents have hit 35% or below since Gallup began tracking presidential approval ratings during President Harry Truman's administration.

None of those presidents, which also include Truman, Lyndon B. Johnson, Ronald Reagan, and George H.W. Bush, hit a mark that low until at least a year and a half into their first term.

Previously, the president to have reached that point most quickly was Truman, whose approval fell to 33% after 524 days in office. The only other presidents to have reached that point in their first term in office are Carter, H.W. Bush, and Reagan.

If Trump sinks any lower, he will be one of just six presidents to do so, as Johnson and Reagan bottomed out at 35%.

Here's a list of the presidents who hit 35% or lower in the Gallup approval rating, with how many days it took them to get there:




    • Trump | 69 days
    • Truman | 524 days
    • Reagan | 741 days
    • Carter | 851 days
    • H.W. Bush | 1,283 days
    • Nixon | 1,659 days
    • Johnson | 1,725 days
    • W. Bush | 1,926 days
Trump's past week featured the failure of the American Health Care Act, the Republican healthcare bill that was pulled from the House floor Friday after it became clear it did not have enough votes to pass. Also last week, FBI Director James Comey confirmed publicly that the bureau was investigating Trump associates in connection with Russia's attempts to meddle in the 2016 presidential election.
http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-worst-week-ahca-fbi-comey-nunes-2017-3
Oops your precious Gallup Poll showed Trump at 35% approval rating but even now with that garbage biased poll he is now at 42%--What now???
 
Oops your precious Gallup Poll showed Trump at 35% approval rating but even now with that garbage biased poll he is now at 42%--What now???


Trumps current Gallup approval rating is 41% and his first term average approval is 40%.Congrats if you think that is a good thing
 
Back
Top