Trumpies kill black man out on a jog

[Bugenhagen]

fetal alcohol syndrome & a life of inceldom as a result. Plus penis envy. Black guys are hung

Well that also. I have grappled and calmed down uncounted guys.. I have heard the old "I don't know what came over me.. tunnel bla bla", a switch flips. We are men, we just want to kill sometimes and if we lose the grip of why not to..

I really can't help but notice the number who are tubbies and by that I mean the slack on the outside indicating a lot of visceral inner fat around the belly and organs.

 

[smallfil]

There was a legal commentator on the news last night stating that the Zimmerman case and this case in Georgia are very different legally. In the Georgia case - at least one of two men confronted Ahmaud Arbery while openly carrying a firearm with the intent of "terrorizing the public" -- so effectively a crime was potentially committed even before the trigger was pulled and it was clear that one of the two men initiated the physical contact.

There is no law that you cannot follow someone in your neighborhood. You have just as much rights to walk through it as anyone else. In the Zimmerman case - all the evidence indicates that Trayvon Martin initiated the physical contact and Zimmerman defended himself from being beaten with a concealed firearm which he was licensed to carry.

Legally these are two very different situations -- according to the legal analyst.

The George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin shooting in Sanford, Florida is very similar to the Darren Wilson/Mike Brown shooting in Ferguson, Missouri. In both cases, George Zimmerman got head injuries to the back of his head from having his head bashed on the pavement, same with Darren Wilson, police officer, consistent with being violently, attacked and having head injuries and shoulder injuries. In both cases, Trayvon Martin and Mike Brown were the aggressors and paid with their lives. Both justified shootings in self-defense.

 

[El OchoCinco]

Actually 911 advised him not to --- this is different then "telling him not to". Taking a walk in your neighborhood is legal. Probably was wise advice which Zimmerman chose to ignore - but it does not impact his legal situation.

BTW I believe this legal analyst was on CNN.

"Stalking and harrassing" IMO opinion is not likely to apply if there has been no previous history - and the person is merely following you but not harassing you verbally or threatening you. Stalking is unlikely to apply unless there is an existing restraining order.

If I am merely following you and not confronting you.... you do not have any right to "defend yourself". If you "defend yourself" in this situation you will be tried for assault if you get physical or on other charges if you are threatening someone.

The Zimmerman / Trayvon situation had no winners. In fact both parties were not very likeable and had many flaws.

Sadly we only know Zimmerman's side of the story because the other person is dead.. why?

I think you need to do some research on legal definition on stalking and harrassing because your definition makes no legal sense. Stalking is not conditioned on there being a restraining order. Stalking is not something you can do legally until a restraining order and stalking can happen one time and still be illegal. DOnt you think it is silly to say you need an RO before stalking is illegal?

Was he harrassing you?

Yes

Was it the first time?

Yes

Ok then no crime has been committed

If you are following me I can call the police on you and does not mean you will be thrown in jail or fined but they will tell you to cut it out or you will be thrown in jail.



next time walk through a neighborhood with not a lot of lights and someone is following you and confronts you, please tell me your reaction because I know I will defend myself because no one follows and harrasses someone for benevolent reasons and I would rather not find out when it is too late this person was up to no good.

 

[Cuddles]

Sadly we only know Zimmerman's side of the story because the other person is dead.. why?

I think you need to do some research on legal definition on stalking and harrassing because your definition makes no legal sense. Stalking is not conditioned on there being a restraining order. Stalking is not something you can do legally until a restraining order and stalking can happen one time and still be illegal. DOnt you think it is silly to say you need an RO before stalking is illegal?

Was he harrassing you?

Yes

Was it the first time?

Yes

Ok then no crime has been committed

If you are following me I can call the police on you and does not mean you will be thrown in jail or fined but they will tell you to cut it out or you will be thrown in jail.



next time walk through a neighborhood with not a lot of lights and someone is following you and confronts you, please tell me your reaction because I know I will defend myself because no one follows and harrasses someone for benevolent reasons and I would rather not find out when it is too late this person was up to no good.

It's the peeping Tom defense. They get off (hehe) all the time! Like lying to the FBI the 1st time

 

[gwb-trading]

It's the peeping Tom defense. They get off (hehe) all the time! Like lying to the FBI the 1st time

Being on private property looking into a window is different than being on public property looking into a window.

The first is a crime.... the second is legal. Go ask any paparazzi.

 

[El OchoCinco]

Being on private property looking into a window is different than being on public property looking into a window.

The first is a crime.... the second is legal. Go ask any paparazzi.

Neither are punishable by death though...

 

[gwb-trading]

Neither are punishable by death though...

Peeking into a window on private property seems to be punishable by death in North Carolina apparently. Haven't seen seen any prosecutions of homeowners shooting peekers ever since they passed the castle law here.

 

[El OchoCinco]

It is a really sad story...

 

[Nine_Ender]

Peeking into a window on private property seems to be punishable by death in North Carolina apparently. Haven't seen seen any prosecutions of homeowners shooting peekers ever since they passed the castle law here.

The law is an ass then. The US has literally gone nuts allowing gun toting dumb asses to act irrationally then lean on lawyers to try to get them off on technicalities. And it's not a lie that more often not it's young black men being targeted because some people tend to fear them or dislike them more then other people.

 

[MoneyMatthew]

inb4 Trayvon
inb4 "mah facts"

Hypocrisy much?
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/teens-savagely-attack-15-year-old-girl.341278/page-5