Yes he is.
What about the Obama started race war? When did that end?
Last edited:
Yes he is.
He actually has said that there is a war brewing between Islam and Christianity. And it seems like he's actively pushing the agenda - thus a "Muslim ban" instead of something else.
He has also said there are too many Asian CEO's in tech and that a "society is more than just its economy."
Most of his agenda is actually founded in racism.
I don't know what race war Obama was trying to start. Maybe the one where unarmed blacks didn't want to be shot at by police officers.
Yes he is.
http://nypost.com/2017/04/11/trump-wont-definitively-say-he-still-backs-bannon/
Trump won’t definitively say he still backs Bannon
![]()
By Michael Goodwin
April 11, 2017 | 8:40pm
Washington’s rumor mill is working overtime on the fate of aide Steve Bannon, who is said to be at the center of the rampant White House in-fighting. When I asked the President Tuesday afternoon if he still has confidence in Bannon, who took over the campaign in mid-August, I did not get a definitive yes.
“I like Steve, but you have to remember he was not involved in my campaign until very late,” Trump said. “I had already beaten all the senators and all the governors, and I didn’t know Steve. I’m my own strategist and it wasn’t like I was going to change strategies because I was facing crooked Hillary.”
He ended by saying, “Steve is a good guy, but I told them to straighten it out or I will.”
So you're saying Bannon recognized that most Islamic terrorists actually turned out to be, you know, from Islam and thus, countries that are known to harbor such individuals should face restrictions from free travel to and from the US? Because that's the majority of Americans see/saw it.
There was extreme vetting under Obama.
It's likely Trump's second ban will be found unconstitutional because the intent is to ban "Muslims" and not ban "terrorists." It's pretty obvious to any rational person that there is a distinction between a Muslim and a terrorist.
Sure, if terrorists carried a "terrorist" ID card, you'd be on to something. But they don't. They hide with other members of their country in an effort to sneak in. So the only choices are to let everyone in, risk death and destruction, or restrict entry until better vetting can be done (which was the entire point of the bill).
Clearly this is a simplistic way of looking at the world. And the kind of viewpoint Bannon is promoting.
There was extreme vetting under Obama and it was working. There were no terrorist attacks from refugees under Obama.
The USA is not like Europe, just like Europe doesn't need to worry about Mexican's crossing illegally, the USA is unlikely to need to worry about ISIS sending terrorists here who have to wait years to get a refugee visa.
Trump was the one who said muslims should not be in til we can vet them.
.