I never said that.
I said that your argument that banning hate speech must put us on a slippery slope, is false.
I also said that The people, in a democracy, via their representatives, can determine what hate speech is. That's how a democracy works...for better or worse. Democracy is the will of the people, not the will to do what is good, or what you or I think is good.
Hate speech/racial slurs, our topic, is bipartisan. Banning hate speech wont politically suppress D's or R's.
I argued that if the people banned hate speech, it doesn't necessarily follow that the democracy is over. The democracy is what we say it is.
I argued that we don't need a 'slippery slope' to go south. My example was the transition from Obama to Trump. There was no slope. It was instant.
I finally provided evidence that the notion of "slippery slopes" is a logical fallacy.