Trump plans to sign EO ending birthright citizenship

[Poindexter]

I'm not the one blindly kissing Trump ass. That would be under your purview. Your efforts at deflection suggest that you're conflicted. I would have thought that you would readily acknowledge your affinity to his hind quarters judging by your shameless posts. Seems you are of two minds (neither of which amounts to much).

Get professional help. You're a 60 year old Canadian and yet you've obsessed about our politics here for over 16 years with four usernames... and now you have severe Trump Derangement Syndrome with over 1,600 posts about him. Get a life in the real world. You're hopelessly out of touch with reality.

 

[Buy1Sell2]

Like I said, you keep making your brethren sound dumber and dumber.

You are what is known in the business as a moronic imbeciliac. Case in point----Civil Rights act of 1964.------- 91 Democrats in The House voted against the bill while only 35 Republicans voted against. ---The Democrats have always been the party of no when it comes to minorities.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

Frankly I would not have a problem with the second amendment being revisited to take out some of the ambiguity. I'm not opposed to bringing the constitution into the 21st century. I know that sets me apart from many of my conservative friends, but many of our current day problems are the result of outdated ideology.

Yes, that would definitely set you apart from your action-hero-wannabe brethren. A step in the right (left?) direction.

 

[newwurldmn]

You are what is known in the business as a moronic imbeciliac. Case in point----Civil Rights act of 1964. 91 Democrats voted against the bill while only 35 Republicans voted against. ---The Democrats have always been the party of no when it comes to minorities.

Referencing 1964 now. Get back in your delorean and comeback to the present era.

Who is the moronic imbecillac here?

 

[Frederick Foresight]

Get professional help.

Perhaps you could recommend one of your own therapists. Let's start with a list of your top 10 for me to choose from.

 

[Poindexter]

Frankly I would not have a problem with the second amendment being revisited to take out some of the ambiguity. I'm not opposed to bringing the constitution into the 21st century. I know that sets me apart from many of my conservative friends, but many of our current day problems are the result of outdated ideology. This would take a congress that actually wanted to solve problems rather than exploit them on the never ending campaign trail. Ain't gonna' happen.

Leftists' ultimate agenda is to abolish the Second Amendment. So I'm against any changes.

Most of the time they're subtle and try to erode it little by little.

"I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." - James Madison

But every now and then they come right out and say it. Like Justice Stevens did:

 

[CaptainObvious]

Yes, that would definitely set you apart from your action-hero-wannabe brethren. A step in the right (left?) direction.

It's not too often anymore that I engage in what I'd call a serious discussion about politics. It's a lost cause. The people in charge have no interest in making any real changes, the system is corrupt and rigged top to bottom, and the average American is too lazy and too self absorbed to make intelligent decisions. Add in the predetermined choices we have for political office, and it's a fools errand. All that's left is the entertainment value.

 

[Buy1Sell2]

You are what is known in the business as a moronic imbeciliac. Case in point----Civil Rights act of 1964.------- 91 Democrats in The House voted against the bill while only 35 Republicans voted against. ---The Democrats have always been the party of no when it comes to minorities.

In The Senate, 21 Democrats voted against the bill and only 6 Republicans did. Basically, only 70 percent of Democrats in both chambers voted for the bill and 80 percent of Republicans did. So now tell me----which party is the actual civil rights party?

 

[Frederick Foresight]

It's not too often anymore that I engage in what I'd call a serious discussion about politics. It's a lost cause. The people in charge have no interest in making any real changes, the system is corrupt and rigged top to bottom, and the average American is too lazy and too self absorbed to make intelligent decisions. Add in the predetermined choices we have for political office, and it's a fools errand. All that's left is the entertainment value.

I agree with being skeptical. But there is no upside in being cynical.

 

[Slartibartfast]

Get professional help. You're a 60 year old Canadian and yet you've obsessed about our politics here for over 16 years with four usernames... and now you have severe Trump Derangement Syndrome with over 1,600 posts about him. Get a life in the real world. You're hopelessly out of touch with reality.

You go girl. You have 1800 posts about him. Your only reason to be here is for your alt right trick bag.

More likes than posts just like Xela lads. Remember that boys. You will kick yourselves.

And no, he is not Xela but they are both freaky deekies.